Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fumigation nation: Battling pesticide use in California

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 07:24 AM
Original message
Fumigation nation: Battling pesticide use in California

from Grist:



Fumigation nation: Battling pesticide use in California

by Twilight Greenaway
18 Oct 2011 8:00 AM


To drive through California's farm fields with a group of anti-pesticide advocates is to see the endless rows of strawberries, lettuce, and Brussels sprouts transform from a bucolic to an ominous sight.

This happened to me on a recent tour of Santa Cruz and Monterey -- two coastal counties known for their cool-weather crops and a wide range of corresponding chemicals used to keep pests at bay. (In 2009 alone, conventional farmers in Monterey County used over 7 million pounds of pesticide, for example). Three advocacy groups -- Californians for Pesticide Reform (CPR), Pesticide Action Network (PANNA) and Pesticide Watch -- convened a group of local politicians to illustrate not only the dangers of pesticide use in the state, but also the viable alternatives. I was lucky enough to get to tag along.

The group toured two successful organic farms along the coast -- Jacobs Farm and Swanton Berry Farm -- where we heard from farmers who grow herbs, vegetables, and strawberries (the latter being at the heart of the debate, as California grows 80 percent of the nation's strawberries), and then from students, former farmworkers, and community members.

Two fumigants lie at the center of the pesticide discussion: As California moved to phase out methyl bromide because of its ozone-depleting qualities, they've moved toward what many see as a far worse alternative. The proposed replacement, methyl iodide, is a known-carcinogen that has been opposed by two dozen California legislators and 54 scientists -- including five Nobel laureates. ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.grist.org/food/2011-10-18-Fumigation-nation



Refresh | +5 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Given the problems with methyl bromide, the obvious solution is to abandon the halogens.
AT BEST, they're going to find something whose problems we haven't studied and don't know about yet. There's no reason to think there will be FEWER problems, just that it will take us longer to find them, and there will be more damage done before we do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC