Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds: Earthquake may have exceeded Virginia nuke plant's safeguards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 03:24 PM
Original message
Feds: Earthquake may have exceeded Virginia nuke plant's safeguards
Feds: Earthquake may have exceeded Virginia nuke plant's safeguards
By Andrew Restuccia - 08/29/11 03:27 PM ET

The earthquake that prompted the shutdown of a Virginia nuclear power plant last week may have been more severe than the plant’s reactors were designed to withstand, federal regulators said.
The revelation is likely to put increased pressure on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to quickly implement a series of safety recommendations intended in part to protect plants from major natural disasters like earthquakes.
NRC said Monday that its preliminary analysis indicates that the ground motion caused by the magnitude-5.8 earthquake near the North Anna Power Station in Louisa County, Va., exceeded the maximum level the two reactors at the plant were built to handle.
But the commission noted in a statement Monday that “data is still being collected and analyzed to determine the precise level of shaking that was experienced at key locations within the North Anna facility.”
NRC decided to send ...

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/178627-earthquake-was-more-severe-than-virginia-nuke-plant-was-designed-to-withstand

It is worth noting that the earthquake intensity AT Fukushima (not the epicenter) only exceeded the design spec of those reactors by a relatively small amount also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Has this nuke plant resumed production?
If not then what is the problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They need to inspect within the containment
That requires bringing the plant to a cold shutdown.

There doesn't appear to be any damage but wouldn't they look like idiots to just power back up without checking and then have something go wrong?

And now that they think the quake may have exceeded the design basis, the inspections need to be even more thorough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throckmorton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wrong again,
Operations does weekly full power walkdown inside containment.

They are moving to cold shutdown because the Tech Specs require it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for the real world info
it helps us peasants understand this better.

I know at the most basic levels they boil water, produce steam and run a turbine... but the fact that the forces may have gone over design spects should be making people go... this could be serious... operative word could... and not try minimize all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC