Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China acknowledges Three Gorges dam 'problems' (BBC)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 08:04 AM
Original message
China acknowledges Three Gorges dam 'problems' (BBC)
By Michael Bristow
BBC News, Beijing

China has admitted that the Three Gorges Dam has created a range of major problems that need solving quickly.

Top leaders say the project has led to environmental problems and issues involving relocating 1.3m people.

The Three Gorges is the world's largest dam and could have cost up to $40bn. This appears to be the first time that central government leaders have admitted to problems with the project.

The admission came in a statement from top government body, the State Council.
***
In this latest statement, the State Council said it knew about some of the problems even before work started 17 years ago.
***
more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13451528 (not much detail)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Someone didn't copy the western design properly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is what started the zombie apocalypse in "World War Z"
if I recall...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. $40 Billion?
I can't think of a cheaper way to produce 20+ GW of electricity (give or take) reliably for the next century or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. A lot depends on how much the remediation is going to cost.
Edited on Thu May-19-11 11:27 AM by GliderGuider
$40 billion was just the original capital cost. There's a lot more yet to be spent on that fiasco.

ETA: For instance, if they were to spend a couple of billion a year on remediation for the next fifty years it might not seem like quite such a screaming deal. Add in an "environmental catastrophe" on top of that, and my enthusiasm wanes dramatically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't think that was just capital costs.
The earlier estimates ($25Billion?) already included almost half that amount for the relocation of something like one and a half million people.

The question is what remediation they agree is necessary. You or I might have a very different standard than a nation that puts millions of her citizens into unsafe coal mines and puts up with the incredible amounts of polution that results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. At least it can generate electricity without irradiating the rest of the world.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. What would the results be if it collapsed in a massive quake 10-15 years from now?
Edited on Thu May-19-11 11:53 AM by FBaggins
How many would die?

Hint - They've already had one dam-failure event that killed almost 200,000 people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. When I first read about the Three Gorges project
I immediately thought "ain't too many ways THAT could go right!"

It'll still have to go a ways to top the sheer ironic folly of the Aswan Dam: turned out that most of the electricity generated went to manufacturing the fertilizer they had to produce in order to replace the natural fertilization of the annual Nile flooding that the dam pretty much prevented.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC