Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Engineer who designed dry storage casks says shut down all nuclear plants, go 100% renewable

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 04:39 AM
Original message
Engineer who designed dry storage casks says shut down all nuclear plants, go 100% renewable
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110514f1.html

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Renewable's time is now, expert says
Goal should be 100% reliance on alternative energy by 2050

By ERIKO ARITA
Staff writer

<snip>

Iida and ISEP researchers estimate that Chubu Electric can provide 30.59 million kilowatts without nuclear power, enough to cover this summer's projected demand of 26.37 million kilowatts.

<snip>

To compensate the public for damage caused by the Fukushima crisis, Iida told The Japan Times that the power companies should tap invisibly collected funds they have set aside for recycling spent nuclear fuel.

The nation's nine power companies with nuclear plants have been charging households about ¥100 to ¥200 per month for the controversial recycling program since 2005, although the charge is not specifically listed on their electricity bills, Iida and industry officials say.

The charge generates some ¥500 billion a year and amounted to ¥2.4 trillion as of March. Iida said this pool of money should be used for compensation.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. The article says that he designed the dry casks for Fukushima.
How many of them are there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throckmorton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually quite a few if I remember correctly
All of the fuel from Unit one that is more than 7 years old was move to them over the past 5 or so years, as I recall. This is why there is very little about Unit 1 SFP in any of the briefings.

It is too early, and I have way to little caffeine in me to review the available data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC