Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mass-Evacuation Tests at Nuclear Plants ‘Difficult,’ Jaczko Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 05:39 PM
Original message
Mass-Evacuation Tests at Nuclear Plants ‘Difficult,’ Jaczko Says
Edited on Tue May-03-11 05:40 PM by Fledermaus
Apparently the nuclear industry has no common sense. Why would someone build these things in heavily populated areas?

60 minutes to Fukushima. Turn the cooling water off and its 60 minutes to Fukushima.

Testing the evacuation of residents near U.S. atomic power plants would be difficult before an emergency, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Gregory Jaczko said.

Running “mass evacuations on a trial basis” is a challenge, Jaczko said today in Washington, answering a question from Ralph Nader, founder of Public Citizen, which opposes nuclear power.

Evacuation plans are being examined in the agency’s 90-day review after a 9-magnitude earthquake and subsequent tsunami knocked out power to reactors at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear plant, leading to the release of radiation.

Policy makers such as New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, say Entergy Corp. (ETR)’s Indian Point plant, which is about 35 miles (56 kilometers) north of Manhattan, is too close to New York City and should be shut.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. And actual evacuation during an emergency would be impossible.
That's why, rather than evacuation exercises, there needs to be no new nukes, and responsible phase-out of existing nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. With the older and more dangerous ones first
Theres still people who think that nuclear power poses no threat to us, what fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How about after an earthquake and tsunami at Diablo Canyon + San Onofre.. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Those should be the first to go
on any fault actually or even close to one. The shits too dangerous for mankind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think it would be difficult. But it would be counter-productive to their propaganda campaign
Edited on Tue May-03-11 08:38 PM by kristopher
They've spent hundreds of millions over the past decade trying to convince people fission technology is safe. The very last thing they want to do is remind them there is a need to worry about fleeing the area.

It is a very real need they are leaving unfulfilled in order to promote their marketing efforts.

Sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC