Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Japan nuclear regulator: no chance radioactive water could enter sea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:08 AM
Original message
Japan nuclear regulator: no chance radioactive water could enter sea
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/27/japan-radiation-idUSS7E7ER00020110327

There is no chance that highly radioactive water from reactor tubine buildings at Japan's stricken nuclear plant could flow into the sea, the country's Nuclear Safety Agency said on Sunday.

"Itt is inconceivable that this should happen. We think there is no chance of the stagnant water (in the buildings) flowing directly into the ocean," a senior agency official told a news briefing when asked about such a scenario.

<not much more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nope, it definately will NOT go...
...DIRECTLY into the ocean. It'll course along the terrain first, seeping into the ground-water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Inconceivable!"


:eyes:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
12.  "I do not think it means what you think it means."
;-)

My first thought, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Back in Happy Talk mode over in Japan
Yesterday's attempt at being transparent didn't go over so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yup - my ability to convince myself that "officials" are forthright and truthful is declining
rapidly

It will be interesting to see how they react to changes in the IAEA status of the accident later this week.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. At least they got back on CNN
Otherwise the media had Fukushima on ignore.

I think we'll know the truth shortly because they have to send workers in there or admit why not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. One way it could be true
Instead of flowing, it's all going up in steam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Interesting phrasing:
"We think there is no chance of the stagnant water (in the buildings) flowing directly into the ocean." Out the door, across the parking lot, into the storm sewer and then into the ocean. Yes, that's conceivable, but not directly into the ocean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Hey look over there is what that man was saying
Anything said to keep on using nuclear energy to produce our electric is fine with the nuke boys.

The facts is the nuke boys can't be trusted to be honest about anything as this statement the man made was a perfect example of. Trust them at your own peril


rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Really?
It sure appears that it did.

Hard to claim that something is impossible after it happens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Noooooooooos!

Say it ain't so.
You're finally reversing sides and being a skeptic?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Skeptical of someone saying water might not run downhill? Sure.
There's clearly radioactive water getting into the ocea from the plant and it's WELL in excess of the levels that the land measurements would make me expect to see. I assume that it came from a reactor core based on the detected elements.

Why... it's almost as unbelievable as all the BS I keep hearing about active fission restarting. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Frodo, are you questioning their honesty??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Sure... or their facts... or the translation.
Something isn't right.

I suppose it's possible that they're saying that THIS water (the puddles in the basement) can't get into the ocean. Maybe that's true (assuming there aren't cracks in the foundation), but they've been pumping thousands of tons of water onto/through radioactive elements. The water isn't all sitting in a little pool in the basement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Really!?!?!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well, somebody's in denial. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. Correct. It's much more likely to end up in the sky, on crops and inside bodies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. Radioactive iodine is already in the local sea
So are they saying it all came from the sky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, if not "directly" then perhaps indirectly, once they start pumping it out,
straight into the sea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC