Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seismology experts warned for years nuclear plants can't withstand true worst-case scenario

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 07:29 AM
Original message
Seismology experts warned for years nuclear plants can't withstand true worst-case scenario
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110327a3.html

Sunday, March 27, 2011
Signs of disaster were there to see
Seismology experts warned for years nuclear plants can't withstand true worst-case scenario

By JUN HONGO
Staff writer

On Feb. 23, 2005, Kobe University professor Katsuhiko Ishibashi appeared before the Lower House Budget Committee and pointed out the risks of operating nuclear power plants in earthquake-prone Japan.

"An earthquake and its seismic thrust can hit multiple parts (of a nuclear plant)" and induce not one but a variety of breakdowns, Ishibashi, an expert on Earth and planetary sciences, told the lawmakers.

Such a scenario could knock out even the backup safety system and possibly result in a "severe accident," such as overheating of the reactor core or even a runaway nuclear reaction, he warned.

Warnings like this from Ishibashi and other experts went largely unheeded.

<snip>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if their scenarios projected even the tsunami zone.
Slightly different topic, but our Governor wants to use up the entire hurricane fund we created when the last hurricane chased all the insurance companies away. It's obvious that we need that fund or our people won't be able to buy houses and get mortgages if history repeats itself. But they can't figure out how to balance the budget so he will leave us in this predicament.

Governments have just as hard a time with worst case scenario planning as any for profit. They too will compromise where they ought not to tempt fate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. We didn't need to hear from them pointy-headed scientificy types anyway.
Everything we need to know is written in The Good Book.
Especially that chapter "Nucleyides", umm, right here...

(Thumbs through tome furiously...)

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Them scientisters. Rong on evolusion,
rong on gloobl warming, rong on nukylar raddation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. There you go again
quoting from Dubya Bush's coloring book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Aw, Krapp.
Kotchd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Reality, is that you?
It looks like the blame game has started too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. There is only one to be blamed
We've seen some blame the environmentalists. Some blame the government. Etc.

But it is the Nuclear Power industry that is to blame for all these problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PamW Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Quake or Tsunami?

What was he talking about "quake" or "tsunami".

The Fukushima plant withstood the plant very well. The quake itself didn't
cause the present problems.

The present problems were caused by the tsunami.

Even the tsunami wouldn't have done this if Tokyo Electric hadn't put the
backup diesel generators in a non-watertight basement.

They had to know that a tsunami was a possibility.

If a tsunami washes over your plant, and your basement is not watertight, then
the basement is going to get flooded.

The had to know that it was important to protect the diesel generators.

Then why oh WHY did they ever think that the basement was a good place for
the diesel generators.

In US plants, the NRC requires that the diesel generators and their fuel tanks
be properly protected.

PamW

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC