Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Three) Japan nuclear workers sustain radiation burns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:16 AM
Original message
(Three) Japan nuclear workers sustain radiation burns
http://calgary.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20110324/japan-radiation-tapwater-110324/20110324/?hub=CalgaryHome

Three workers at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant are being treated for radiation burns to their feet and legs, after stepping into contaminated water while laying electrical cables in one unit, Japanese officials say.

The two workers suffered "beta ray burns," officials at plant owner Tokyo Electric Power Co, said, citing doctors. Such burns cause damage only to the skin and are unlikely to cause systemic radiation sickness.

"The men were working in the No. 3 reactor, which in many ways has been the most nightmarish of them all, with its regular belching of unexplained black smoke and its highly toxic fuel – that's the one reactor that has plutonium as well as uranium in its fuel rods," CTV's Tom Walters told Canada AM from Osaka, Japan, Thursday morning.

Fumio Matsuda, a spokesman for the Nuclear and Industry Safety, said the men tested for radiation levels between 170 to 180 millisieverts.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sending blessings of healing and light
to them and everyone else affected by the radiation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think that makes 17 workers so far
with doses greater than 100 but less than the new limit of 260.

I think these three are higher than all but one of the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Did they change the limit just for this crisis?
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 10:46 AM by ReturnoftheDjedi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes.
But it doesn't look like they're sticking to it.

They increased the limit early in the crisis when it looked like a small number of experts were remaining while others were evacuated. They were worried that some critical person would go over 100 and be forced to leave when he was needed.

Since then they have far more people on site and from what I've read, the people who go over 100 are being assigned to other tasks away from the plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. that's reassuring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throckmorton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. I realize it is just a crappy news photo, but
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 10:47 AM by Throckmorton
It appears to me that there is still no power to the main annunciator system, and most of the instrumentation on the main control board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'd iimagine that there are dozens of systems that still lack power.
Or rather can't be powered up because of a short somewhere or broken equipment on the other end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throckmorton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-11 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, but the troubling thing is
The safety related power systems are more robust that the non-safety systems, like lights and such. I would have expected that those would have been a priority, right behind behind control room ventilation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC