Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mitch McConnell (R-moran) Defends Nuclear Power Amid Japan Fears

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 11:12 AM
Original message
Mitch McConnell (R-moran) Defends Nuclear Power Amid Japan Fears
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/03/13/mcconnell-defends-nuclear-power-amid-japan-fears/?mod=google_news_blog

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said Sunday that he doesn’t believe the U.S. should back away from nuclear energy in the wake of potential reactor meltdowns in Japan.

“This discussion reminds me, somewhat, of the conversations that were going on after the BP oil spill last year,” Mr. McConnell said during an interview on “Fox News Sunday.” “I don’t think right after a major environmental catastrophe is a very good time to be making American domestic policy.”

As congressional Republicans engage the White House on the issue of rising energy prices, the potential meltdown at a nuclear facility in Japan threatens to undermine a central element in the Republican push for expanded domestic energy production: new permits and financial incentives to spur the construction of new nuclear facilities in the U.S.

The potential for a nuclear disaster, triggered by last Friday’s record-setting earthquake, could undermine that argument in much the same way that last year’s oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico stymied calls to open more offshore sites to underwater oil and gas drilling. With average gas prices nearing $4-a-gallon, Republicans took shots at President Barack Obama this week for issuing too few drilling permits in the Gulf.

<more>

yeah - we should make policy after the disasters - not before...

idiot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, his opinion clinched the one I held. No nuclear plants!
Anything that #$%^& agrees to encourages me to stand by my opinion, no matter the subject. I haven't agreed with anything he's said/done to this point. Why start now?

We've done enough harm to the world. In my opinion, the Repugs are responsible for the majority of harm. Quick and dirty is their method. To hell with the masses.

Isn't he about ready to retire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. This would be a good time to have a Congressional junket to Japan...
Mitch can personally inspect the Fukishima Da-ichi plant to show us how safe it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Darn you beat me to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Fear based policy doesn't help anyone
We shouldn't be making our policy based on the effects of a freak event on 50-year-old, dawn-of-the-Nuclear-Age reactor designs.

"Don't build nuke plants where they can be damaged by earthquakes and tsunamis" = good takeaway

"Don't build nuke plants at all" = bad takeaway

All power generation has negative environmental effects, we should make a mature, calculated decision weighing the pros and cons, rather than making a panicked decision in the heat of the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. He and his banksters did not think that when they rushed the bailouts for
the banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. IOW, "Making Policy In Light Of Unpleasant, Inescapable Reality = Bad Idea"
Edited on Sun Mar-13-11 01:31 PM by hatrack
Whatever, Turtle-Man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC