Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

World phosphorous use crosses critical threshold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 06:20 PM
Original message
World phosphorous use crosses critical threshold
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-02/uow-wpu021411.php
Public release date: 14-Feb-2011

Contact: Steve Carpenter
srcarpen@wisc.edu
608-262-3014
http://www.wisc.edu/">University of Wisconsin-Madison

World phosphorous use crosses critical threshold

MADISON — Recalculating the global use of phosphorous, a fertilizer linchpin of modern agriculture, a team of researchers warns that the world's stocks may soon be in short supply and that overuse in the industrialized world has become a leading cause of the pollution of lakes, rivers and streams.

Writing in the Feb. 14 edition of the journal Environmental Research Letters, Stephen Carpenter of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Elena Bennett of McGill University report that the human use of phosphorous, primarily in the industrialized world, is causing the widespread eutrophication of fresh surface water. What's more, the minable global stocks of phosphorous are concentrated in just a few countries and are in decline, posing the risk of global shortages within the next 20 years.

"There is a finite amount of phosphorous in the world," says Carpenter, a UW-Madison professor of limnology and one of the world's leading authorities on lakes and streams. "This is a material that's becoming more rare and we need to use it more efficiently."

Phosphorous is an essential element for life. Living organisms, including humans, have small amounts and the element is crucial for driving the energetic processes of cells. In agriculture, phosphorous mined from ancient marine deposits is widely used to boost crop yields. The element also has other industrial uses.

But excess phosphorous from fertilizer that washes from farm fields and suburban lawns into lakes and streams is the primary cause of the algae blooms that throw freshwater ecosystems out of kilter and degrade water quality. Phosphorous pollution poses a risk to fish and other aquatic life as well as to the animals and humans who depend on clean fresh water. In some instances, excess phosphorous sparks blooms of toxic algae, which pose a direct threat to human and animal life.

"If you have too much phosphorous, you get eutrophication," explains Carpenter of the cycle of excessive plant and algae growth that significantly degrades bodies of fresh water. "Phosphorous stimulates the growth of algae and weeds near shore and some of the algae can contain cyanobacteria, which are toxic. You lose fish. You lose water quality for drinking."

The fertilizer-fueled algae blooms themselves amplify the problem as the algae die and release accumulated phosphorous back into the water.

Carpenter and Bennett write in their Environmental Research Letters report that the "planetary boundary for freshwater eutrophication has been crossed while potential boundaries for ocean anoxic events and depletion of phosphate rock reserves loom in the future."

Complicating the problem, says Carpenter, is the fact that excess phosphorous in the environment is a problem primarily in the industrialized world, mainly Europe, North America and parts of Asia. In other parts of the world, notably Africa and Australia, soils are phosphorous poor, creating a stark imbalance. Ironically, soils in places like North America, where fertilizers with phosphorous are most commonly applied, are already loaded with the element.

"Some soils have plenty of phosphorous, and some soils do not and you need to add phosphorous to grow crops on them," Carpenter notes. "It's this patchiness that makes the problem tricky."

Bennett and Carpenter argue that agricultural practices to better conserve phosphate within agricultural ecosystems are necessary to avert the widespread pollution of surface waters. Phosphorous from parts of the world where the element is abundant, they say, can be moved to phosphorous deficient regions of the world by extracting phosphorous from manure, for example, using manure digesters.

Deposits of phosphate, the form of the element that is mined for agriculture and other purposes, take many millions of years to form. The nations with the largest reserves of the element are the United States, China and Morocco.

###


The new study was supported by grants from the U.S. National Science Foundation and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Terry Devitt, 608-262-8282, trdevitt@wisc.edu


http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/6/1/014009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Modern" agriculture
>> a fertilizer linchpin of modern agriculture

Here's where people start to realize that modern agriculture is not sustainable. Looks like it will be "old-timey" agriculture before long.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Now don't be a Debbie Downer. It's just another one of those non-existent "limit" thingys
Edited on Mon Feb-14-11 07:14 PM by GliderGuider
I'm sure we'll work around it - we're humans, after all, not animals. There are no limits for us. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. There's an app for that, isn't there? -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. It's not something to look forward to.
Edited on Wed Feb-16-11 06:21 PM by Confusious
It means starvation for hundreds of millions, if not billions.

In Europe, before the creation of fertilizers, the population was 200~250 million. Now it's 850 million.

The population would drop by half without those fertilizers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jokinomx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well just another gog in the wheel of the coming collapse....
along with unchecked population growth, food shortages are a certainty in the coming months and years.

Throw in the numbers of people marginalized by low water levels and climate changes worldwide and it's not hard to be prophetic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Drip drip drip. I feel like I'm watching a horror film:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Peak Phosphorus in 1989
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeaper Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. We stopped putting phosphates in laundry detergent around 1989.
The use of phosphorus in soap was a significant consumer of phosphates that is why your so called peak was in 1989.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Who is "we"?
According to this story, about 15% of world phosphate production is used in food and detergents. There is no global ban on phosphates in detergents. There are local bans but they are apparently routinely ignored, even in the USA.

I don't think a ban on phosphate in detergents is responsible for the production peak. Can you gather a bit more evidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeaper Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. We would be the United States.
Like I said phosphates were banned in laundry detergents many years ago. The dish washing detergence’s were a recent ban.

Back in the 80s and 90s I worked in a phosphorus plant, the laundry detergent ban was one of the nails in its coffin (been shut down since 2000).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. A ban "many years ago" doesn't result in a peak today.
At best it would set a peak back by a year or two, since ongoing consumption would be reduced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC