Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: "G.O.P. Gains on Capitol Hill May Not Advance Nuclear Power"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:39 AM
Original message
NYT: "G.O.P. Gains on Capitol Hill May Not Advance Nuclear Power"
G.O.P. Gains on Capitol Hill May Not Advance Nuclear Power
By MATTHEW L. WALD
Published: November 16, 2010

THE outspoken supporters of nuclear power are mostly Republicans, and the Republicans are about to take control of the House of Representatives and gain six seats in the Senate. Is this good news for nuclear power?

Maybe. But the outlook for a new wave of reactors is still mixed at best.

Many prominent Republicans say the United States should embark on a building campaign. Senator John McCain of Arizona, as the party’s 2008 presidential nominee, called for 45 more reactors by 2030, and Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, wants 100 more reactors by then.

But the party dislikes something that the nuclear industry needs: global warming rules. Republican progress in the midterm elections probably dooms prospects for a cap-and-trade system on carbon dioxide emissions for now. ...


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/17/business/energy-environment/17NUCLEAR.html?src=busln
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. No shit: because the Republicans have no interest in nuclear power.
And despite your claims, they never did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Their proposal to Waxman-Markey was 100 nuclear reactors.
Now whether that isn't support or not is up for you to convince me. I may not buy that they were just introducing it to be contrarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I call it lip service.
Look where the actual breaks go, look where the money goes, and look where their money comes from. It's coal, oil, and gas, all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This nuke building CEO disagrees with you. He is plenty happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hmm, a CEO spins inevitable events as good for his company. I'm shocked!
I bet you can dig up a quote from him from 2006 saying how great it is that Democrats are in power, since that will make alternative energy a priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Do you realize you just argued against your own claims?
Just to remind you: you have been trying to rewrite reality to say that Republicans do not *really* support nuclear power in spite of the clear evidence to the contrary.

TheWraith, "Hmm, a CEO spins inevitable events as good for his company. I'm shocked! I bet you can dig up a quote from him from 2006 saying how great it is that Democrats are in power, since that will make alternative energy a priority."

Maybe you want to "clarify" that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Get back to me when Republicans support anti-industry concepts like LFTR or TWR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC