Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA Cuts Cellulosic Ethanol Fuel Mandate 94% - Still Not Commercially Scalable - Bloomberg

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 12:49 PM
Original message
EPA Cuts Cellulosic Ethanol Fuel Mandate 94% - Still Not Commercially Scalable - Bloomberg
The Environmental Protection Agency proposed requiring less cellulosic ethanol to be blended into gasoline next year than sought under U.S. law because production of the alternative fuel hasn’t reached commercial scale.

The decision is part of the EPA’s proposed standard for renewable fuels of about 14 billion gallons, or 7.95 percent of transportation fuels used in the U.S., the agency said today in a news release. The goal for cellulosic biofuels, based on an analysis of market availability, is 5 million to 17.1 million gallons, or as much as 0.015 percent, according to the agency.

Cellulosic ethanol, made from switchgrass, wood chips and agricultural waste such as corn cobs, has been promoted as having a smaller carbon footprint than fuel made from corn because it provides less incentive to cut down trees or plow up prairies to create cropland. The Obama administration said it will continue to evaluate the market as it works to make the cellulosic standard final in coming months. The EPA “remains optimistic” that the commercial availability of cellulosic biofuel will continue to rise over the next few years, the agency said.

In February, the EPA slashed the cellulosic ethanol mandate for this year by 94 percent, reducing the goal to 6.5 million gallons from the 100 million required under a 2007 energy law. The agency said corn-based ethanol produces less greenhouse-gas emissions than previously anticipated, clearing the way for more use of the fuel.

EDIT

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-12/epa-proposes-cellulosic-ethanol-requirement-that-falls-short-of-u-s-goals.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Christopher Calder Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Biofuels should be banned, not subsidized and mandated!
PLEASE SEE "The biofuel hoax is causing as world food crisis!" at: http://biofuel.50webs.com/

There are no good biofuels for automotive use and there never will be. Ethanol and biodiesel should be banned, not mandated and subsidized. Biofuel production has been the greatest tragedy of the past 20 years, killing more people than the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined, and doing far more environmental damage worldwide than any other new activity of man. The biofuel hoax was born of greed and political corruption, and has only been allowed to happen because our television media has refused to cover the subject honestly. Both Republican and Democratic parties are guilty as hell in this deadly and destructive fiasco, and many famous people of both political parties continue to support this biofuel insanity even though they have been presented with the real scientific facts about how counterproductive it all is. Politicians are largely ego driven and power hungry. They will support causes they know are destructive to their own nation just to win the next election. We need to expose the biofuel hoax for what it is, and hold accountable all those politicians who have brought the human food supply to such a desperate point of inadequacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kringle Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. corn exports...bad for the US economy .nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC