Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Contract Signed On RAPP 7 and 8 Nuclear Power Plants In India.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 06:42 AM
Original message
Contract Signed On RAPP 7 and 8 Nuclear Power Plants In India.
Hindustan Construction Company (HCC) will undertake main plant civil works of units 7 and 8 of the Rajasthan Atomic Power Project (RAPP) after a Rs8880 million ($188 million) contract by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL).

RAPP 7 and 8 will be 700 MWe indigenously designed pressurized heavy water reactors (PHWRs). The units are scheduled to begin commercial operation in June and December 2016, respectively. HCC has constructed all six existing units at RAPP, which are also PHWRs of varying sizes, the first of which began operating in 1973 and the latest earlier this year.

Under the latest contract, the scope of the work involves construction of the reactor buildings, auxiliary buildings and the waste management exhaust ventilation building...


The bold is mine, as is placed there to show what a nation with a nuclear infrastructure can do.

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-HCC_awarded_contract_for_new_RAPP_units-2605106.html">Contract for Indian reactor components.

I personally regard the Indian Nuclear Power program to be one of the most innovative and exciting in the world, because of India's huge thorium resources, which India clearly intends to exploit. While the rest of the world is trying to wipe up its oil with Downey paper towels, India will come to possess the world's largest supply of U-233, which will place them in the cat bird seat for a huge portion of the 21st century.

The United States possesses about one ton of U-233, manufactured from thorium in the last half of the 20th century, some of it in our very first commercial nuclear reactor, Shippingport, which operated for about 3 years as a thermal breeder reactor during the Carter administration.

We're so wise here, that we're thinking of throwing it away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. NO nukes!!!
No one has yet figured out a safe way to dispose of waste...nor how to stop disasters which can have global effects. With the irresponsibility of BP and Halliburton causing the gulf disaster, who's to stop some other corporation from choosing to cut costs...this is insanity, we are asking for cataclysms of unknown proportions, Chernobyl is still a dead zone, and thousands of people are still paying in their health for that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bullshit. Just because YOU don't know what to do with so called "nuclear waste" and just because
Edited on Sat Jun-05-10 10:17 AM by NNadir
you are spectacularly uninterested in phasing out dangerous fossil fuels because of their waste profiles, doesn't mean that educated people don't know what to do with used nuclear fuel.

I personally hold every single uneducated anti-science anti-nuke responsible for the destruction of the Gulf of Mexico.

Nuclear power need not be perfect to be vastly superior to all the stuff that you don't care about, and about which you know very little. It merely needs to be vastly superior everything else, which it is.

Let me know, by the way, if you are refusing to drive in cars because the Yugo caused accidents.

Ignorance kills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC