Are the dead animals washing up with 'no signs of oil related death' being killed by the oil dispersants?
The reporter,Brad Plumer, notes that some of this is because the pictures aren't there -- not enough dead birds and fish to make people understand how huge this is. I'm sure that's part of it. And it isn't an accident:
Now, part of the explanation here is that BP has been quite deft at managing appearances. For one, they're using hundreds of thousands of gallons of chemical dispersants to break up the oil before it can reach the beaches, causing it to sink down to the sea floor. In some cases, these dispersants could be more harmful, ecologically speaking, then letting the oil wash ashore. We don't know what's in these chemicals and there's a very high potential that they could do a lot of damage to the food chain in the Gulf. Indeed, that's why Exxon was constrained from using dispersants in Prince William Sound back in 1989. But, from BP's perspective (and the Obama administration's), avoiding the sort of graphic imagery that Exxon had to deal with in Alaska seems appealing.
...
These dispersants are the environmental equivalent of tasers. They may be killers, but the don't leave marks and that's all that matters.
We are a nation of cover-up artists. And most people are good with that because the scope of the disasters we are confronting are overwhelming. But you can't hide from this level of failure anymore. It's building and building on itself, which is why there is a growing sense of social unrest. Leadership is required to help people understand what's happening and it isn't happening.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/if-you-cant-see-it-it-doesnt-exist-what.html