|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 07:11 PM Original message |
European support for nuclear power as a solution to climate change plummets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. I recomend everyone read the actual report. Green peace glosses over a lot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Thanks for your search for truth and explaination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 12:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Oh, the part about "true or false, are new nuclear plants being built in our country" was amazing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. Fieldwork from 9/09-10/09 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 04:45 AM Response to Original message |
5. 17% rate of support for increasing nuclear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 09:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Yes... that's 17% supporting increasing nuclear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 11:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Also the keep nuclear option is up 5%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 12:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. There is ONLY a 17% rate of support for increasing nuclear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. Support for nuclear increasing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 12:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. The rate of support for increasing nuclear is a shitty 17%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. And climbing... while the "reduced" support falls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. People DO NOT WANT NUCLEAR POWER. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. "Couldn't be more clear" TO YOU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. 34% DECREASE 17% INCREASE = Good news for nuclear??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:36 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 02:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. Shows how desperate they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 02:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Lol! How would *you* have answered the question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 11:51 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. What? No answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 11:55 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Bananas may actually have the guts to answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 01:55 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Answer the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 02:00 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Excuse me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 02:40 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Answer the question, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 02:41 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. What question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 02:44 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. So you CAN'T answer the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. You're just plain, nuts, aren't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Resorting to personal attacks because you can't answer the question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Nope... not answering "the question" because no question has been asked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 03:20 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Not that dodge again. You have lost all credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Nope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 04:04 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Typical pronuke evasion and spin - answer the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Which question would that be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 09:31 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. It's not ambiguous; you are just assuming that 39% of people can't understand their language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. It's clear you've never done polling or designed polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Simple, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. ROFLMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Translation "I can't rebut that" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. ROFLMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. "Still wrong" yet you can't come up with any reason why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. My pleasure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 02:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. No cigar, champ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 02:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. Only if you assume that Europeans are idiots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Kris thinks this poll is also ambiguous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 06:00 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Exactly, it's the same issue as it too captures both views. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. So what you're saying is that 13% are so stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 06:15 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. No, I'm saying the question has a weakness - because it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. It's clear you've never done polling or designed polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. Lower than Congress... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Lower than CHENEY.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. That really puts it in perspective! They'd rather have Dick Cheney than nuclear energy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
6. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 02:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
29. From almost two-thirds to less than half |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 02:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Only in the world of nuclear industry PR would this polling be positive... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Oh no... see... you don't understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. A post without credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC