Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Number Of Non-IVF/ART Triplets Born In Norway Doubles From 1970 Rates - Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 12:27 PM
Original message
Number Of Non-IVF/ART Triplets Born In Norway Doubles From 1970 Rates - Reuters
Edited on Fri Apr-02-10 12:31 PM by hatrack
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - There are about twice as many sets of triplets born in Norway every year compared to 40 years ago -- not including babies conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART), new research shows.

Once ART babies were added to the mix, the rate of triplet births roughly tripled, Dr. A. Tandberg of Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen and colleagues found.

While the study wasn't designed to investigate the reasons behind the increase in non-ART births, the researchers suggest that a sharp increase in use of the ovulation-stimulating drug clomiphene citrate since the early 1970s was likely a factor.

In countries where ART is widely used, the researchers say, the rate of triplet births climbed slowly beginning in the 1980s, and then started to decline at the beginning of the current century. However, they say, the role of ART in this pattern has not been clear. To investigate, they looked at 2.2 million pregnancies in Norway between 1967 and 2006, including 448 triplet sets and 27,575 twin pairs. After 1988, when ART was introduced, the country introduced a separate registry for artificially conceived births.

EDIT

http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2010/04/01/eline/links/20100401elin021.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Multiple births beyond twins are not good news, not cute, and not good for the babies.
The risk of birth defects, learning disabilities, etc, rises exponentially beyond twins. Not to mention there's nearly a guarantee of low birth weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes
I wonder how much this reflects better prenatal, perinatal and neonatal care...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC