|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 01:28 AM Original message |
Oh, those sexy building codes: More powerful than 100 nuclear plants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. Except, of course... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 07:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Then we'd be cutting the need for additional growth - by half. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
3. The "all new stuff" approach to the environment? Some people might think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's totally true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. We need to raise the minimum bar on efficiency for new buildings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Just how do you do that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. We already do it for certain items.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Once more for the hard of hearing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 01:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Yes we can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 10:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. He didn't say certain materials should be mandated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-31-10 02:53 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. There was nothing wrong with his explaination and you're just arguing for the sake of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-10 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Let's apply a little math |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC