Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

12 Miles High: An Integrated Airship-Radar Is on the Horizon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 06:53 PM
Original message
12 Miles High: An Integrated Airship-Radar Is on the Horizon
http://www.mitre.org/news/digest/defense_intelligence/03_10/isis.html

12 Miles High: An Integrated Airship-Radar Is on the Horizon

March 2010

Editor's note: This article originally appeared in MITRE's employee publication, MITRE Matters.

A high-altitude reconnaissance and surveillance platform, the Integrated Sensor Is the Structure (ISIS) is a tall order—literally. The unmanned airship, which measures 450 feet in length, will soar 70,000 feet above Earth for up to 10 years. It's not exactly the Goodyear blimp, and—in case you haven't guessed already—it's designed to cover more than the Super Bowl.



ISIS, like all blimps, is filled with helium, but comparisons end there. Hovering in the stratosphere, safely out of range of most surface-to-air or air-to-air missiles, ISIS is designed to provide unsurpassed situational awareness with a surveillance range of 187 miles for individuals on the ground and 373 miles for advanced cruise missiles.

From its parking space in the heavens, ISIS will have an excellent vantage point for surveillance and tracking. For example, objects on the ground can't disappear from the view of ISIS behind trees or mountains. "It's not just point coverage, like a view of a city," says Perry Hamlyn, head of MITRE's Advanced Wireless Electronics department. "You can see significant areas of an entire region."

...

Energy generation and storage present another significant design challenge. ISIS includes novel power systems for the airship that are based on solar-regenerative power. Solar cells collect energy from the sun and create hydrogen and oxygen from water during the day. At night, the hydrogen and oxygen are recombined in the fuel cell, which releases energy that allows the airship to operate after dark. Fuel cells were chosen for energy storage since they offer the best mass-to-energy storage ratio when compared to batteries and other storage systems.

"We developed solar availability and system energy models, performed trade studies, and provided technical support to ISIS from the early concept phase all the way up to the current demonstration phase," says Hamlyn. "Throughout the program, we have been helping the contractors and the government ensure the technical feasibility of the project."

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ten years, my ass...
We'll see what the next meteor shower has to say about this. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You mean like the ones that bring down 747's all the time?
Or, like the one's which brought down the International Space Station?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Maybe you missed this
"significantly reduced fabric mass"

As far as I know, the ISS and 747s are built with something stronger than wet Kleenex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I guess they probably aren't aware of the hazard
Or, maybe they are.

http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2007/1/2007_1_38.shtml

The Inflatable Satellite

To build a communications satellite, NASA engineers fell back on humanity’s oldest flight technology

By Nick D’Alto

...

The balloon’s skin was made from dimensionally stable polyethylene terephthalate—better known as Mylar—.0005 inch thick (“half as thick as the cellophane from a cigarette pack,” as it was often described). In 1959 Mylar was most familiar to consumers for its use in frozen-food pouches that could be dropped into boiling water; it was also used for recording tape. NASA researchers tested dozens of materials, but only Mylar met the severe criteria, which included holding together at temperatures ranging from 300 degrees Fahrenheit in direct sunlight to -80 degrees in the earth’s shadow.

...

Even in the near-emptiness of outer space, the fragile ball faced dangers. On August 14 it survived a meteor shower. The orbit had been chosen so that the balloon would spend its first week and a half in constant sunlight, and when it passed into the earth’s shadow for the first time, observers held their breath. Robbed of the sun’s heat, the balloon’s gas might resolidify, and it was an open question whether the balloon might grow misshapen or even burst on subsequent reinflation. These fears proved groundless.

The seemingly frail balloon proved remarkably durable. Though “wrinkled like a prune” (according to press reports) by the tons of micrometeorites that hit, and eventually punctured, its thin skin, the weary traveler kept flying, broadcasting the first television pictures by satellite (images of a rodeo cowboy and a trained seal) in April 1962.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. VAST difference in altitudes
The proposed blimp/radar would be at 70,000 feet, roughly 13 miles up. That's still well under a LOT of atmosphere. Weather balloons often climb twice as high, and airplanes such as the SR-71 or can sustain level flight at 100,000 feet. To do that, both weather balloons and the 2 aircraft REQUIRE a decent amount of air. Air that causes micro meteorites to burn up tens or hundreds of thousands of feet higher.

'Space' is typically defined as starting at 62 miles, roughly 325,000 feet up. At that point you are 'mostly' in a vacuum. But satellites don't orbit there, because there are still atmospheric traces which, over time, will slow down an orbiting body enough to drop it out of orbit. So satellites (and other orbiting bodies, like the ISS) are almost always above 200 miles up, and often several thousand miles up. Really the only reason to have a satellite down below 400 is if you'd like it serviced by the Space Shuttle, or if you don't intend for it to be in space long.

Point is, at 13 miles (70,000 feet) micrometeorites are a minor risk. Mechanical/tech failures, storm stresses on the cable, hell, even the hazards this would impose on general aviation navigation, are far more weighty issues than space debris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. A Chobham-armored airliner wouldn't be proof against meteorites
That said, the next plane that gets tagged with one will be the first to have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Integrated Sensor Is the Structure?
Remember kids, never attempt a cool backronym before 4 cups of coffee, or after 4 pints of beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually, I'd prefer people avoided "backronyms" entirely
Honestly, did someone say, "Let's see, what would 'L-A-S-E-R' stand for?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Maybe they were trying to avoid "airship-radar surveillance experiment" at any cost. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. This is an American airship buddy!
We only use English bacronyms. (OK, so maybe a few transliterated Egyptian ones, but that's it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. fair enough...
Airship surveillance structure with integrated power experiment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's more like it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. You're pretty good at that, LOL! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Actually, it was named in analogy to the maser.
And the acronym spells out what it does quite straightforwardly -- amplification by stimulated emission.

But I do detest politically motivated acronyms in which it becomes obvious that more effort was devoted to the acronym than to implementing the program, so I'm not in total disagreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yes, I remembered that shortly after posting
But, then more people have heard of a LASER than have heard of MASER (also an acronym.)

In the 70's, I was outraged when I saw in a dictionary, LAZER listed as an alternate spelling for LASER. ("Alternate spelling!? What does the 'Z' stand for!?")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Ztimulated, obviously
A more interesting question is how do you pronounce it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. How do you pronounce it?
Well, the same way I pronounce "LASER."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I always thought it was mildly amusing that the most general case would be ...
ElectroMagnetic Radiation Ampli... i.e. ERASER.

Though having the word radiation appear twice is kinda clunky. :( Always a fly in the swill somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. I think they should take it a step further and have all acronyms be recursive. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. They have had similar blimps
along the US-Mexican border for decades.
Take a look at the FAA's Pheonix Sectional map near the Fort Huachuca/Bisbee area.
http://skyvector.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC