Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

World Bank Launches Internal Investigation Into Cambodian Logging Fiasco

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 08:07 AM
Original message
World Bank Launches Internal Investigation Into Cambodian Logging Fiasco
Editorial note - this is a press release so I have included the entire piece.

"Global Witness warmly welcomes the recent decision by the World Bank board to authorise an Inspection Panel investigation of its Forest Concession Management and Control Pilot Project in Cambodia (FCMCPP).

For five years, the Bank has used the FCMCPP to promote a system of logging concessions that has demonstrably failed Cambodia economically, socially and environmentally. In the face of overwhelming evidence, the Bank has nevertheless clung to the notion that the mafia-style logging syndicates which have ravaged Cambodia’s forests can be reformed.

In 2004 an independent forest sector review commissioned by international donor institutions and the Cambodian government concluded that the logging concession system should be scrapped. Just two months later, however, the Bank’s project recommended that the government approve the forest management plans of six companies which have a long history of illegal logging and contractual violations.

A group of Cambodian villagers who have previously suffered at the hands of these companies lodged a complaint against the project with the Bank’s Inspection Panel in February this year. In March the Panel recommended to the Bank’s executive directors that it undertake a full investigation of the FCMCPP.

“The Inspection Panel process provides the opportunity to hold the Bank to account for five years of blunders in Cambodia,” said Global Witness Director Simon Taylor. “The Bank must, at a minimum, renounce its project’s endorsement of companies whose operations are a parody of sustainable forest management. Furthermore, it should use this investigation as the basis for a fundamental revision of its approach to forest management in post-conflict countries.”

The Inspection Panel investigation in Cambodia is all the more relevant given current challenges facing the international donor community in other post-conflict countries, particularly the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). DRC possesses the second largest tropical forest in the world and 40 million of its 58 million people depend on it for survival. Indications from the initial stages of the Bank’s work in DRC suggest that the lessons of Cambodia have not been learned.

“The Bank is over-ambitious in its estimates of potential timber revenues and makes the basic assumption that industrial logging is the best use of DRC’s forests. It has an unrealistic expectation that policies and commitments will be matched by political will and good governance, and all this in a vast country just emerging from full-scale civil war. This is exactly how the Bank approached its work in Cambodia; however it is not too late to salvage the situation in DRC given commitment, the necessary resources and, above all, some original thinking.” said Global Witness Director Patrick Alley.


For further information, please contact Simon Taylor (tel. 44 (0)20 7272 6731; 44 (0)7957 142 121, staylor@globalwitness.org); or Mike Davis (tel. 855 (0)12 527 523, mdavis@globalwitness.org)."

http://www.globalwitness.org/press_releases/display2.php?id=286
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC