Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leaking Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant shutdown ordered

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 11:04 AM
Original message
Leaking Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant shutdown ordered
http://www.sfbayview.com/2010/leaking-vermont-yankee-nuclear-power-plant-shutdown-ordered-as-obama-pledges-50-billion-for-nuclear-power/

In the depths of a near-Depression, the Vermont Senate on Wednesday voted overwhelmingly for health and safety over jobs and tax revenue when it chose not to renew Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant’s operating license when it expires in 2012. Unless Entergy, the plant’s owner, can stop the leaks of radioactive tritium, the 26-4 vote means the plant will shut down in March 2012, taking 650 jobs and $9 million in tax revenue with it.

Vermont Yankee is a 38-year-old decaying nuclear reactor running flat out at 120 percent of capacity in Vernon, Vermont. It is about 30 miles north of Mount Holyoke College. A few miles further south are Amherst College and hundreds of other colleges and prep schools.

Millions of people are within its range. Should Vermont Yankee lose enough coolant to expose the glowing uranium core to air, it catches on fire and the hydrogen gas manufactured normally in the reactor explodes.

Vermont Yankee is sitting on top of its own outhouse-toilet-in-the-woods, a 100m by 50m by 9m (m = meter, or about 39 inches) underground “lake” of highly radioactive reactor coolant vigorously pumped there by Vermont Yankee itself already.

<more>

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Another victory for the dangerous fossil fuel industry. None of the people who caused
Edited on Sat Feb-27-10 11:12 AM by NNadir
this anti-science disaster will give a fuck about the people killed by this moral disaster, by the dangerous fossil fuel waste which actually kills people.

Ignorance kills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Booo hooo hoo
:rofl:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm sure the gas industry, which owns the state of Maine - I suspect we have some owners of gas
Edited on Sat Feb-27-10 11:37 AM by NNadir
and oil stocks here -is an excellent example of Vermont's future.

When Maine shut it's largest supply of climate change gas free energy out of vast scientific ignorance and illiteracy, millions of tons of dangeorus fossil fuel waste was dumped indiscriminately into earth's atmosphere, the Maine fossil fuel waste dump:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/st_profiles/sept05me.xls

Vermont is the only state in the union that is close to be climate change gas free, but that will change, as our gas fronts - who lie and lie and lie and lie about their intent by fraudulent representations with their emporer's new clothes about their failed solar and wind industry -

I have always understood that the anti-nukes are indifferent to climate change. After all, almost all of them are gas, oil and coal owned and operated and funded.

What is annoying about them, is that while they don't give a fuck about climate change, they lie about it, crying crocodile tears about climate change while working to destroy the world's largest, by far, source of climate change gas free energy.

I'm sure that many of our brats here, living off trust funds, producing nothing worthwhile, will see their gas stock portfolios grow.

People will die. The ground cap rock in North America will be pulverized by the gas industry, and the greedy creeps responsible for this disaster will sit around and giggle insipidly.

Fortunately the President of the United States and the Secretary of Energy are fighting the anti-nukes and their murderous ignorance, but it is probably too late.

Have a nice denialist day, and ask your Mom to increase the gas futures portfolio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The gas industry doesn't own the State of Maine - there are no gas wells here
and Maine produces MORE electricity from renewables than from natural gas.

Unlike Nuclear-New-Jersey-Which-Is-A-Fraud.

Does your Mommy know about the fictitious New Jersey molten salt breeder?

Well does she?

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Vermonters for Cancer will be ecstatic about this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Imagine a future powered by 100% natural maple syrup
and you will be invoking all of the common sense used to reach this decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. If it's contaminated with tritium from Vermont Yankee, it can't be sold
nuclear power

:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. There's tritium-contaminated syrup on those pancakes you're eating right now
from atomic testing in the 50s-60s.

Better step in a closet, and see if you're glowing yet. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Ummm...tritium has a half-life of 12.3 years and most of that is gone - decayed or washed to sea
Unlike the DEADLY tritium leakage from the suckage that is Vermont Yankee....

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Deadly? Has anything, anywhere died from tritium contamination?
Pray, do tell. *crickets*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes - DEADLY!!!111
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Still waiting.
Maybe your little rofl dude could get off his ass and google for you, since you're too lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. IT'S DEADLY!!111
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It's with utmost pleasure
Edited on Sat Feb-27-10 12:24 PM by wtmusic
I welcome you to ignore, where many finer than you have tread before.

Your idiotic aversion to truth, your tenuous grip on science, your....eh, I'm bored.

:hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Do you remember posting the information about how safe nuclear was?
Edited on Sat Feb-27-10 12:31 PM by kristopher
The post where you cited a blog that compared the fatalities of different energy sources by deaths/kwh?

since you never replied after we examined the claims in that site, I was wondering just how you arrive at your "science" based conclusions? That piece was filled with overt, unambiguous false data and equally overt, unambiguous false reasoning with the false data.

I've really wondered why you declined to discuss the "science" that you claimed was provided by that so called analysis....

Do you remember? I can refresh your memory if you'd like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. you can ignore me, but not the Deadly Threat of Dangerous Deadly Tritium
I have actually worked with Dangerous Deadly Tritium - have you?

...and if Dangerous Deadly Tritium was "safe" then there would be no objection to say letting nuclear facilities contaminate local drinking water with Dangerous Deadly Tritium - or atmospheric nuclear testing (which produces Dangerous Deadly Tritium) ..or letting the public purchase Dangerous Deadly Tritium without an NRC license.

This is why the state of Vermont voted to SHUT IT DOWN.

cuz it's DEADLY!!!11

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Somebody alert Team Obama
and the pro-nuke asshats here spamming DU with their propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC