|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
OKIsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-13-10 02:39 PM Original message |
New turbines, more wind energy power generation (global generating capacity grew 31% in 2009) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happy_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-13-10 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-13-10 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. Thirty-one percent of next to nothing is still next to nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-13-10 09:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Yes, it appears that it may take as much as 70 plus years to get us to zero carbon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-13-10 11:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. That is an extremely childish extrapolation by a nuclear power proponent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-14-10 11:11 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Right, it would be more like 25 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKIsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-14-10 08:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. However, I don't believe we can count on exponential growth for 25 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-14-10 11:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. No, it would be 25 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-13-10 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. How did global capacity go up 31% if the European leader only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKIsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-13-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. China is not in Europe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-14-10 11:03 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. tiny url for that link; it says 340 TWh per year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-14-10 11:53 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. 340 TWh = 1.2 exajoules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC