Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At Stanford, nanotubes + ink + paper = equal instant battery

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 07:40 PM
Original message
At Stanford, nanotubes + ink + paper = equal instant battery
Edited on Mon Dec-07-09 07:42 PM by OKIsItJustMe
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/december7/nanotubes-ink-paper-120709.html
Stanford Report, December 7, 2009

At Stanford, nanotubes + ink + paper = equal instant battery

Dip an ordinary piece of paper into ink infused with carbon nanotubes and silver nanowires, and it turns into a battery or supercapacitor. Crumple the piece of paper, and it still works. Stanford researcher Yi Cui sees many uses for this new way of storing electricity.

BY JANELLE WEAVER

Stanford scientists are harnessing nanotechnology to quickly produce ultra-lightweight, bendable batteries and supercapacitors in the form of everyday paper.

Simply coating a sheet of paper with ink made of carbon nanotubes and silver nanowires makes a highly conductive storage device, said Yi Cui, assistant professor of materials science and engineering.

"Society really needs a low-cost, high-performance energy storage device, such as batteries and simple supercapacitors," he said.

Like batteries, capacitors hold an electric charge, but for a shorter period of time. However, capacitors can store and discharge electricity much more rapidly than a battery.

Cui's work is reported in the paper "Highly Conductive Paper for Energy Storage Devices," published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"These nanomaterials are special," Cui said. "They're a one-dimensional structure with very small diameters." The small diameter helps the nanomaterial ink stick strongly to the fibrous paper, making the battery and supercapacitor very durable. The paper supercapacitor may last through 40,000 charge-discharge cycles – at least an order of magnitude more than lithium batteries. The nanomaterials also make ideal conductors because they move electricity along much more efficiently than ordinary conductors, Cui said.

Cui had previously created nanomaterial energy storage devices using plastics. His new research shows that a paper battery is more durable because the ink adheres more strongly to paper (answering the question, "Paper or plastic?"). What's more, you can crumple or fold the paper battery, or even soak it in acidic or basic solutions, and the performance does not degrade. "We just haven't tested what happens when you burn it," he said.

The flexibility of paper allows for many clever applications. "If I want to paint my wall with a conducting energy storage device," Cui said, "I can use a brush." In his lab, he demonstrated the battery to a visitor by connecting it to an LED (light-emitting diode), which glowed brightly.

A paper supercapacitor may be especially useful for applications like electric or hybrid cars, which depend on the quick transfer of electricity. The paper supercapacitor's high surface-to-volume ratio gives it an advantage.

"This technology has potential to be commercialized within a short time," said Peidong Yang, professor of chemistry at the University of California-Berkeley. "I don't think it will be limited to just energy storage devices," he said. "This is potentially a very nice, low-cost, flexible electrode for any electrical device."

Cui predicts the biggest impact may be in large-scale storage of electricity on the distribution grid. Excess electricity generated at night, for example, could be saved for peak-use periods during the day. Wind farms and solar energy systems also may require storage.

"The most important part of this paper is how a simple thing in daily life – paper – can be used as a substrate to make functional conductive electrodes by a simple process," Yang said. "It's nanotechnology related to daily life, essentially."

Cui's research team includes postdoctoral scholars Liangbing Hu and JangWook Choi, and graduate student Yuan Yang.

Janelle Weaver is a science-writing intern at the Stanford News Service.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPTcQJPbGHw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scubadude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nanotubes + Lungs = Cancer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sulfuric Acid + Skin = Burns
Edited on Mon Dec-07-09 07:49 PM by OKIsItJustMe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, there are a lot of things in regular batteries
that are dangerous or poisonous, I assume that any nanotube battery or capacitor will be similarly encapsulated. This is a step in the right direction, I'm not going to go Luddite on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yi Cui has lots of fascinating papers, too:
Here's his publications page: http://www.stanford.edu/group/cui_group/publications.html

The paper may be "Crystalline-Amorphous Core-Shell Silicon Nanowires for High Capacity and High Current Battery Electrodes" but it is unclear to me, he does a lot of work on this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I really do think that in a few years our whol landscape could look different
With all the new tech coming down the pike like the nanotube lead acid batteries. I think batteries along with capacitors will be what we'll ultimately be powering our personal transportation with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, I agree, I think if we can star mass manufacturing those crazy high capacity batteries...
...we may be on to something good. I'm waiting to see what happens, though. When people claim a 10x breakthrough we gotta wait for it to actually make it to mass manufacture before assuming it's there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Theres lots of things that can be done in the lab
or on paper that just simply can't be made so for every breakthrough there have been many letdowns. I'm confident that we have it within ourselves to find the solutions to our problems if it's worked on rather than chasing our tails on promises that have proven to not be what they were trumped up to be, talking about nuclear energy here. Nothing more I'd love to have than an unlimited supply of clean pain free electricity but the fact is we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. dupe
Edited on Mon Dec-07-09 09:44 PM by joshcryer
dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC