Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arctic Methane Release May Already Approach 14-19 Million Tons/Year From Thermokarst Lakes - SciAm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 01:42 PM
Original message
Arctic Methane Release May Already Approach 14-19 Million Tons/Year From Thermokarst Lakes - SciAm
EDIT

All winter I ventured across frozen lakes to set more traps above these seeps. More than once I stepped unknowingly on a bubbling hotspot and plunged into ice-cold water. Methane hotspots in lake beds can emit so much gas that the convection caused by bubbling can prevent all but a thin skin of ice from forming above, leaving brittle openings the size of manhole covers even when the air temperature reaches –50 degrees C in the dark Siberian winter. I caught as much as 25 liters (eight gallons) of methane each day from individual seeps, much more than scientists usually find. I kept maps of the hotspots and tallies of their emissions across numerous lakes. The strongest bubbling occurred near the margins of lakes where permafrost was most actively thawing. The radiocarbon age of the gas, up to 43,000 years old in some places, pointed to yedoma carbon as the culprit. From 2002 to 2009 I conducted methane-seep surveys on 60 lakes of different types and sizes in Siberia and Alaska. What scientists were not expecting was that the increase in methane emissions across the study region was disproportional to the increase in lake area over that same region. It was nearly 45 percent greater. It was accelerating.

Extrapolated to lakes across the Arctic, my preliminary estimate indicated that 14 million to 35 million metric tons of methane a year were being released. Evidence from polar ice-core rec­ords and radiocarbon dating of ancient drained lake basins has revealed that 10,000 to 11,000 years ago thermokarst lakes contributed substantially to abrupt climate warming—up to 87 percent of the Northern Hemisphere methane that helped to end the Ice Age. This outpouring tells us that under the right conditions, permafrost thaw and methane release can pick up speed, creating a positive feedback loop: Pleistocene-age carbon is released as methane, contributing to atmospheric warming, which triggers more thawing and more methane release. Now man-made warming threatens to once again trigger large feedbacks.

How fast might these feedbacks occur? In 2007 global climate models reported by the Intergov­ernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projected the strongest future warming in the high latitudes, with some models predicting a rise of seven to eight degrees C by the end of the 21st century. Based on numerous analyses, my colleagues and I predict that at least 50 billion tons of methane will escape from ther­mo­karst lakes in Siberia as yedoma thaws during the next decades to centuries. This amount is 10 times all the methane currently in the atmosphere.

Even with our best efforts, our current estimates beg more sophisticated modeling as well as consideration of potential negative feedbacks, which could serve as breaks on the system. For instance, in Alaska, a record number of thermokarst lakes are draining. Lakes formed in upland areas grow until they hit a slope. Then the water flows downhill, causing erosion and further drainage, sending melted sediment into rivers and eventually the ocean. Drained basins fill in with new vegetation, often becoming wetlands. Although they produce methane when they are unfrozen in summer, their total annual emissions are often less than those of lakes. It is hard to say whether such potential processes would lessen methane release by a sizable amount or just a few percentage points. Two projects of mine, with my Fairbanks colleague Guido Grosse, Lawrence Plug of Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia, Mary Edwards of the University of Southampton in England and others, began in 2008 to improve the first-order approximations of positive and negative feedbacks. A key step is to produce maps and a classification of thermokarst lakes and carbon cycling for regions of Siberia and Alaska, which we hope to draft by early 2010. The cross-disciplinary research links ecological and emissions measurements, geophysics, remote sensing, laboratory incubation of thawed permafrost soils and lake sediments, and other disciplines. The goal is to inform a quantitative model of methane and carbon dioxide emissions from thermokarst lakes from the Last Glacial Maximum (21,000 years ago) to the present and to forecast climate-warming feedbacks of methane from lakes for the upcoming decades to centuries.

EDIT

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=methane-a-menace-surfaces&page=3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. How is it that only "may" is used? Don't we have the tools to actually measure
this stuff yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. At 20X the warming potential of CO2, that's 400 million tons per year of CO2-equivalent
Or roughly the same amount released by the entire population of Australia per year.

Fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Worse than that - at 26X, which is a bit closer to the standard value, it's about . . .
364 million tons (low-end estimate) or 494 million tons (high-end estimate).

Very roughly, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think you are low in your estimate.
First, the article says "...estimate indicated that 14 million to 35 million metric tons...", not the "14 to 19" in the title. So, even at only 20X, that would be 280 to 700 million.
But, second, the real issue is what may happen in the long run. Quoting from the OP: "I predict that at least 50 billion tons of methane will escape from ther­mo­karst lakes in Siberia as yedoma thaws during the next decades to centuries." 50 billion tons times 20X (conservatively) gives 1000 billion tons. Since one part per million of the atmosphere is around 5 billion tons (4.41, I think, is more precise), that sounds like more than 200 parts per million over "the next decades to centuries".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Frankly, this is the one that scares the piss out of me.
And at this point there is sweet Fanny Adams we can do except wait and wonder. The change that's already visible tells us the wheels are in motion. This looks to me like the front end of the climate train wreck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And here's the kicker, this methane will affect the arctic more than any other place.
This is why all of the runaway scenarios are so foreboding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yep ...
> This is why all of the runaway scenarios are so foreboding.

Oops ... feedback loop ...
Oops ... feedback loop ...
Oops ... feedback loop ...
Oops ... feedback loop ...
Oops ... feedback loop ...
Oops ... feedback loop ...
Oops ... feedback loop ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Carbon's anniversary
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC