Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study Projects Windpower Growth At 26% For 2005 - Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-05 09:59 AM
Original message
Study Projects Windpower Growth At 26% For 2005 - Reuters
COPENHAGEN - "New installed global wind-power capacity should rise 16.6 percent on average per year in the next four years, with Europe leading world demand, an industry report showed on Thursday.

In 2005, growth is expected to be around 26 percent. The report by Danish consultancy BTM showed that total wind-power capacity grew 20 percent to almost 48,000 megawatts last year -- enough to fuel about 16 million homes -- although growth in 2004 was lower than in 2003.

"This is the first time since 1996 that stagnation in new installation has been observed, a temporary event mainly caused by the drop in the US market," it said.

Last year, 8,154 megawatts of new capacity was added, a decrease in annual installation of 2.3 percent compared with the record year 2003. The industry has shown an average growth of 15.8 percent over the past five years."

EDIT

http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/30191/story.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kk897 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. sounds good, but...
Is it enough? Or is this just a drop in the bucket, so to speak, of relieving Peak Oil pressures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Windpower has little to do with peak oil.
Edited on Sat Apr-02-05 12:21 PM by NNadir
Oil is responsible for very little power generation.

It does have a lot to do with global warming though when it replaces coal and natural gas capacity. Wind power is in most cases the cleanest way to generate electricity known. It works very well; and it's economics are quite good. The only problem with it is that it is intermittent and can be unreliable.

It, like other forms of clean energy, has a NIMBY problem though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kk897 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I realize that, which is why I phrased it the way I did.
I'm wondering if there's some way to put the extra wind power to work to solve some of the *pressures* the Peak Oil problem is causing/will cause (depending upon how you look at it). In other words, is there some way to use it in other applications where fossil fuels have been used in the past? I don't know much about it, really. Could there be some way of capturing the electricity generated by wind power in some kind of battery that could power a vehicle, for instance?

It was a genuine question on my part--I wasn't being a smarty pants. Maybe a dumb question, but I didn't mean to denigrate wind power in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You were not being a "smarty pants" and I hope I wasn't flippant.
Batteries, at least metal based batteries have quite a bit of inefficiency, have poor environmental properties, and are generally expensive. That said, battery technology is getting better all the time, as the successful introduction of hybrid technology, portable computers, cell phones, etc show.

Some hybrids, I believe will have pluggable options and, as wind power is not necessarily available at peak loads, on further reflection, your question is not completely off base. That said, my guess is that wind will not make a huge dent in the demand for oil. While wind capacity is rapidly being installed, the reliability issue still remains and the resources are not infinite. Most transportation energy loads occur at peak hours (rush hour for instance) and the opportunity for recharge, presumably at night, will not necessarily be the time that the wind is available.

Still, I favor wind technology almost anywhere it is installed. It is so safe and clean that it is actually safer than nuclear energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kk897 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-05 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks for the reply!
I would love to see wind farms sprout up across the land where practicable and not damaging to the environment. I'd love to see solar power cels on every roof (that is, solar power cels peeking out of grass roofs). Heck, I'd love to see houses built underground, rammed earth, straw bale construction, etc.... You're right; such measures might not make a huge dent in the coming energy crisis, but it would give us a cleaner, more pleasant environment, and those who embrace alternative energy sources and building methods would at least be better prepared to deal with the compounding problems of Peak Oil.

One of the problems that people who study Peak Oil mention is maintaining a fresh water supply. Of course, farms and ranches have depended upon a small version of wind power for ages--the well/windmill setup. That might be one way to use wind farms, only on a larger scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Electricity is not made using oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Actually, I think some of it is
Gas and oil-fired generators are not ubiquitous, but there are plenty of them. Hydroelectric and nuclear power are two of the other major sources, even with the aversion to nuclear power plants and the drought in the West.

Does any one have a source for the statistics on electricity generation?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If I recall it is a little below 2%. Oil is mainly used for peaking plants
Edited on Sun Apr-03-05 05:06 PM by Massacure
Gas is cheaper to run for peaking plants though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC