style of your own.
In fact, fundie boy, speaking only for myself, I can refer to a program for phasing out dangerous fossil fuels that I wrote years ago:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/6/17/19109/0486">The Utility of Light: Getting Real with the Existing Energy Infrastructure.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/24/195214/27">Banning Oil: Dimethyl ether, Hydrogen, Nuclear Power and Motor Fuel for Cars and Trucks.
On the other hand, Hammy boy, or sock puppet or whatever it is you are - I couldn't care less - your claim that pro-nuclear activists accept your indifference to dangerous fossil fuels is one or more of the following: Ignorance, misrepresentation, character assassination, making stuff up, or any of a series of logical fallacies in which the anti-nuke cults routinely engage because they can't think, can't reason, can't do science, can't read science, can't do math and can't calculate.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/">Dumb Fundie Anti-Nuke School of Witless Rhetoric.
Nuclear energy need not be perfect to be vastly superior to all the stuff that all the anti-nukes and their sock-puppets couldn't care less about. It nearly needs to be vastly superior to all the stuff you don't care about, and, happily
it is.
The fact is, fundie boy, I can refer to
hundreds of writings on the internet about dangerous fossil fuel disasters and um, you can't.
Have a nice oblivious fundamentalist day.