Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Consumer Is a Target of Planned Obsolescence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Yehonala Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 04:28 PM
Original message
The Consumer Is a Target of Planned Obsolescence
"The consumer is perpetually targeted directly by corporations and various businesses to buy, wear/use products, and then swiftly discard them when they are no longer fashionable. This method is called “planned obsolescence.” Planned obsolescence is defined as “the conscious decision on the part of an agency to produce a consumer product that will become obsolete in a defined time frame.” This phrase was coined by an American industrialist named Brooks Stevens. The fashion industry, car industry, and even companies that produce razors for shaving are but a few types of businesses that practice and promote this wasteful method of production and eventual planned consumption."

http://businesslinkshere.com/TheConsumerIsaTargetofPlannedObsolescence.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. The auto industry...and the electronic industry are charter subscribers to this philosophy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I would also add kitchen appliances to that.
I've been fucking pissed at the longevity (or lack of) for our kitchen appliances. And when I researched on consumer reports, I discovered that the brands we had (sears/kenmore) were pretty much at the top of the reliability lists. In other words, everybody in that market space makes products as crappy or crappier.

There appears to be absolutely nobody who has pursued the niche of "more-expensive-but-lasts-forever"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not true, that.
The Japanese domestic market is fixated on quality. Living space is at a premium and frugality is a social virtue.


This doesn't increase your purchasing options here unless you are conversant in Japanese and are willing to pay the freight and money xfer fees. We just bought a not-available-here item from a shop in Tokyo online and the final tally was around 3X the already high retail price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Quality and frugality? Hmm, it really is a foreign culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Why not “cheap-but-lasts-forever?”
Seriously… I can think of things from my grandparents’ generation (and before) which are still in use in the family today…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Before they discovered planned obsolecense.
The fools! They saturated their own markets by making stuff that lasted forever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Flash!
Seems I remember reading something about that in Mad Magazine, circa 1958. Seriously!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Best two word argument against libertarianism.
Best one word argument--Enron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bernard London
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence#Origins_of_the_term

Origins of the term

Origins of planned obsolescence go back at least as far as 1932 with Bernard London's pamphlet Ending the Depression Through Planned Obsolescence. However, the phrase was first popularized in 1954 by Brooks Stevens, an American industrial designer. Stevens was due to give a talk at an advertising conference in Minneapolis in 1954. Without giving it much thought, he used the term as the title of his talk.

From that point on, "planned obsolescence" became Stevens' catchphrase. By his definition, planned obsolescence was "Instilling in the buyer the desire to own something a little newer, a little better, a little sooner than is necessary."

Stevens' term was taken up by others, and his own definition was challenged. By the late 1950s, planned obsolescence had become a commonly used term for products designed to break easily or to quickly go out of style. In fact, the concept was so widely recognized that, in 1959, Volkswagen mocked it in a now-legendary advertising campaign. While acknowledging the widespread use of planned obsolescence among automobile manufacturers, Volkswagen pitched itself as an alternative. "We do not believe in planned obsolescence," the ads suggested. "We don't change a car for the sake of change."

In 1960, cultural critic Vance Packard published The Waste Makers, promoted as an exposé of "the systematic attempt of business to make us wasteful, debt-ridden, permanently discontented individuals."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC