Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PEMEX Cites "Doubts" About Chincotpec's Profitability - Projections Now 60K B/D By Year-End, Not 72

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:22 PM
Original message
PEMEX Cites "Doubts" About Chincotpec's Profitability - Projections Now 60K B/D By Year-End, Not 72
Sept. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Petroleos Mexicanos, the state- owned oil company, needs to find a profitable way to develop its Chicontepec field, Chief Executive Officer Juan Jose Suarez Coppel said.

There are “certainly doubts” about the field’s profitability and the technology that should be used, said Suarez Coppel, who took the helm of Latin America’s largest oil producer on Sept. 8. “Chicontepec has a great potential, and we have to keep investing to find a way to exploit it in a profitable manner,” he said today in a Radio Formula interview.

The government is “evaluating” its $11.1 billion Chicontepec investment after the field missed production targets, Energy Minister Georgina Kessel told Bloomberg last week. Mexico City-based Pemex in June cut its forecast for the onshore field to 60,000 barrels a day by year-end, down from a previous prediction of 72,000.

“There’s a lot of potential onshore,” said Suarez Coppel. “Not so much in new fields, but developing the matured fields where we haven’t applied new technologies.”

EDIT

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=aFSLTT1I.oMs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. "but developing the matured fields where we haven’t applied new technologies."
Suck that straw harder! Make 'er gurgle...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Chocolate or strawberry?
Love dem bubbles!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. More like, "replace that straw with a vacuum tube, and complex set of suction devices." :)
Reserves that were once thought not accessible became accessible. The same is true of Mexico, it's just that they don't have the tech to get it done. For better or for worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craftsman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mexico is screwed
There is oil there. But to get it and find it will take tech and people they do not have. They can get them in Houston. But the rub is they will not spend the money, they won't and can't seek foreign investments. To make PEMEX they nationalized all the US and European oil concerns years ago. These companies are not going to come back. They have no way of knowing if they will be forced out again without compensation. And every time a Mexican politico talks of selling part of PEMEX they are shouted down. All the money they can squeeze out of PEMEX funds social programs. But due to mismanagement that is running out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Cartels
Maybe the drug cartels will be able to revive the petroleum ndustry once they´ve taken over. They have the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They don't have the knowledge or the tech, though. Which was the point the above poster was making.
They're kinda stuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yeah - when they had the time and the money, they did nothing.
Edited on Fri Sep-11-09 06:46 PM by bhikkhu
Now they have declining fields, no time, no money, and no alternatives in place. The rest of the world might want to take a look at that and consider their own position along the curve...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC