Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should urinals be installed in home bathrooms?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:43 PM
Original message
Should urinals be installed in home bathrooms?
Was looking at my monthly water bill and began to wonder how I could reduce water consumption. while thinking about it and doing some other projects around the house, I had to use the bathroom a couple of times to urinate. As I flushed the toilet, I knew 1.6 gals. was being used and wondered if a urinal installed in the bathroom would save money. considering that the toilet is used most of the time to flush liquid waste, I went did some Google searching on flush usage.

The toilet, by law, has a 1.6 gal. tank so close to that number is the amount of water being used per flush. On line, I found that the newer urinals use 1 gal. per flush which would be a 40% reduction in water usage for the elimination of liquid waste. There are urinals on the market that use no water at all and seem to work quite well.

Of course, this would apply only to males and one would have to calculate the potential savings based on the percentage of males in the house. Maybe the best outcome though would be that it would end the battle of the toilet seat being left up. It would also eliminate the complaints from daughters who raise holy hell because their thoughtless brother(s) didn't put the seat up and pissed all over the seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. If it's yellow, let it mellow...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rj5690 Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
create.peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. if it's yellow let it mellow is the rule here. or pee in a bucket until you need to dump it....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. that is our rule too..which includes women...till toilet paper becomes a problem
then flush...I agree, an ounce or two of pee does not require 1.6 gallons of water in order to render it harmless...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
create.peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. if you have spent time in mexico (maybe other countries with less that great plumbing, too)
you know to put your (pee only) TP in the garbage, not the toilet. i love to go to a good authentic mexican restaurant because i know the bathroom will have a garbage can near the commode!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. I installed one of these and quit buying toilet paper
except for the guest bath

http://www.biffy.com/index-2.html

we have 'his and hers' hand towels next to the toilet and voila!

if it's yellow we leave it mellow and with no TP it can stay all day. we probably only flush 3-4 times a day now......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think urinals in homes would be really unattractive...
Edited on Thu Aug-27-09 05:46 PM by bear425
Go with the "when it's yellow let it mellow; etc..." method instead to save water.

on edit: I see great minds think alike!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Men could always pee in a bucket. I guess you could dump out in the back yard
when it gets full. Gross and stinky, but it saves water, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Myself being raise with no indoor plumbing
You'll have a hard time convincing me to pee in a bucket now at my age. I'm of the type to do 2 or 3 pees to one flush, depending on the smell that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Only if you want to burn the grass
People in Asia use what's politely referred to as night soil on their gardens. It's why you never see raw veggie salads there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think so - they're also cleaner since there isn't as much "spray" when the urine hits the water
because the man can usually pee straight into the back of the urinal, versus peeing down a few feet into water.

You can also get by with flushing the urinal far less often.

You can also put bricks and other stuff in the tank of the toilet to reduce the amount of water it stores, so that it uses less water in each flush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. There are waterless urinals.
I saw one on HGTV.

http://www.zeroflush.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Calculated that 3500 gals. per year would be saved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. You have to account for the water and time cleaning piss off the walls
and floor around the urinal. There ain't no such thing as a straight stream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob Gregory Browne Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'll continue to flush, thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do building codes even allow this?
I'd hate to think of the permits you'd have to get for this.

And the pissed off angry neighbors showing up to protest granting these permits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. I wish toilets had 2 flush levels:
a little flush for little jobs and a big flush for big jobs.

We "let it mellow" here, but that's only in our house. When I am somewhere else I flush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I've thought the same thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. I believe there are such toilets.
One button for liquid, the other for solid waste.

We don't flush for pee until there is a quantity of TP in the bowl. Also have a shut-off valve in the shower to turn off the water while sudsing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. I've seen those kind of toilets in Israel n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. That is a standard feature of Japanese toilets.
Push the lever one direction and a small burst of water dilutes the bowl, push it the other direction and it gives a full flush.

Some homes also have urinals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. That's a standard toilet in France nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. Wash dishes by hand instead of using a dishwasher and flush away.
Assuming you pee 6 times a day, you'd use 2.4 gallons more water by peeing into a toilet than a urinal.

Wash your dishes by hand? Save 15 gallons...and you save all of the plumbing expense.


Alternately, just reduce one shower a day by about 70 seconds, and you'll save as much as you would by installing a urinal.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Does washing dishes by hand save water?
Sometimes I wonder how much water I use to scrub and rinse each plate. Is it more water efficient? Has there ever been a study on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I believe the method is to fill the sink with water, wash, drain the sink, and then rinse them all.
Depending on the dishwasher and the setting, figure 7-20 gallons of water.

5 to do them by hand.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Hmmm....maybe I'll pick at tub.
Thanks for the tip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Two thoughts.
I think they SHOULD be! But try convincing my wife! I think a urinal would get a LOT more use than a bidet.

Another thing, and this is a can of worms, but I honestly don't think we should be flushing our poop with drinkable water. I wish we could have two incoming water lines, one just for toilets. I can't help but think it would take an incredible load off of the water that needs to be processed for drinking, washing, showers, etc.

here come the jokes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Flushing with gray water is a great idea...
...it just requires more plumbing that wouldn't be cost effective with the current price of potable water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I've had that thought too
If the sinks and the bathtub went into a cistern, then the cistern was used for the toilet, then you wouldn't have the clean water waste (not to mention the electric waste for pumping and purification.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. I think gray water systems are available now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. Just force all men to be "sitzpinklers" and the mess problem is
solved. Yeah...that'll work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Wasn't there a political party in Scandinavia that called for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Force proud Standspritzers to sitzpinkle? Never. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
33. Put a couple of bricks in the toilet tank. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
34. Terrible waste of urea
...the whole water closet system. If we think sustainable, we think recycled flows of energy and matter. Meaning, putting our waste back to agricultural production, to fertilize land!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urea#Uses

Check composting toilets:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composting_toilet


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rj5690 Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
35. Sure. Why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC