Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Global dimming and brightening more complex than previously thought

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:13 PM
Original message
Global dimming and brightening more complex than previously thought
http://www.agu.org/cgi-bin/highlights/highlights.cgi?action=show&doi=10.1029/2008JD011263&jc=jd
Editors' Highlight

Global dimming and brightening more complex than previously thought

Several studies show evidence of a widespread decrease in solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface from the 1960s through about the early 1990s. Termed "global dimming," this decrease was followed by "brightening" during the late 1990s. Past efforts correlated brightening trends to decreases in atmospheric aerosol concentrations due to successful environmental regulations and recovery from the Mount Pinatubo eruption. To learn more about the mechanics of dimming and brightening, Long et al. (2009) studied observations of shortwave radiation collected by the U.S. government at 12 surface sites across the United States. These data, aggregated into all-sky and clear-sky surveys, show that widespread brightening occurred over the continental United States during the past 12 years at rates higher than previously thought. The authors found that changes in aerosol concentrations and other direct effects cannot fully explain the observed changes in shortwave radiation. They showed that decreases in cloudiness, which may be indirectly influenced by decreasing aerosol concentrations, have played a significant role in observed brightening patterns. Further, they suggested that the causes of global brightening are complex and are best studied locally or regionally, rather than on a global or continental scale.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011263">View abstract

http://www.agu.org/journals/jd/jd0907/2008JD011263">View full article (Subscription required)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. How well do IPCC-AR4/CMIP3 climate models simulate global dimming/brightening and twentieth&#8...
Edited on Wed May-06-09 06:22 PM by OKIsItJustMe
http://www.agu.org/journals/jd/jd0907/2008JD011263

How well do IPCC‐AR4/CMIP3 climate models simulate global dimming/brightening and twentieth‐century daytime and nighttime warming?

Martin Wild

Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Observations indicate that greenhouse induced twentieth‐century warming has been strongly modulated by variations in surface solar radiation. Between the 1950s and 1980s, declining surface solar radiation (“global dimming”) likely caused a dampening of global warming, whereas increasing surface solar radiation (“brightening”) may have contributed to the rapid warming in the last 2 decades, and possibly also in the first half of the twentieth century. This is also reflected in the decadal evolution of diurnal temperature range, which is highly correlated with surface solar radiation, and which shows a distinct transition from a strong decrease between the 1950s and 1980s, toward a leveling off thereafter. The present study investigates to what extent these effects are simulated in the latest generation of global climate models used in the fourth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment report (AR4) (phase 3 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3) models). While these models reproduce the overall twentieth century warming over global land surfaces well, they underestimate the decadal variations in the warming and particularly also in diurnal temperature range, indicative of a lack of decadal variations in surface solar radiation in the models.
Received 29 October 2008; accepted 28 January 2009; published 1 May 2009.

Citation: Wild, M. (2009), How well do IPCC‐AR4/CMIP3 climate models simulate global dimming/brightening and twentieth‐century daytime and nighttime warming?, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00D11, doi:10.1029/2008JD011372.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. rather amazing that global dimming was almost
sufficiently an offset for warming until we improved improved regulations to reduce emissions from cars and smokestacks.

I'm not sure if it was this article or something else I read that attributed our emissions to causing the multi decade drought in Africa (the emissions caused dimming which affected ocean temperature which affected prevailing currents which......)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC