Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Polywell fusion final report double-checked by peer-review panel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 06:49 AM
Original message
Polywell fusion final report double-checked by peer-review panel
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/12/16/1718741.aspx

Fusion we can believe in?
Posted: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:30 PM by Alan Boyle

Working on a shoestring budget, researchers have found no reason why a low-cost approach to nuclear fusion won't work.

President-elect Barack Obama's pick for energy secretary has said he's aware of the approach, known as inertial electrostatic confinement fusion or Polywell fusion - and although it's probably not on his radar screen right now, it just might show up in the future.

<snip>

An EMC2 team headed by Los Alamos researcher Richard Nebel (who's on leave from his federal lab job) picked up the baton from Bussard and tried to duplicate the results. The team has turned in its final report, and it's been double-checked by a peer-review panel, Nebel told me today. Although he couldn't go into the details, he said the verdict was positive.

"There's nothing in there that suggests this will not work," Nebel said. "That's a very different statement from saying that it will work."

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is truly great news.
Bussard was one of the few remaining "giants" from the hey day of physics. I'm glad to see that his last project is still going. Hopefully, now that the anti-science fossil fuel guys are packing up and getting out of the White House, more money will be found to continue funding this approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's not the despair, Laura...
I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand.

John Cleese, Clockwise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for the update
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 04:54 PM by OKIsItJustMe
I'd been thinking it was about time we'd heard something.

I think we should all drop the President Elect a little note, asking that he fund this program in full (and then some.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janap Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Polywell fusion bust
They say that the devil is in the details. It certainly is with the Polywell fusor. This and the other fusors are going for the fusion of boron and hydrogen to avoid the production of neutrons. Those devil neutrons, those little devils that make the anti nukes turn green. The B-H fusors will never reach energy break even at one billion degrees it will take to reach B-H fusion. Someone will fuse tritium and deuterium with all those high energy plutonium producing neutrons but that is just as bad as those devil fission reactors with all that proliferation danger. Oh well! Back to the solar panels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC