Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nate Holden: no bailouts without electric cars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 02:20 PM
Original message
Nate Holden: no bailouts without electric cars
Los Angeles – November 18, 2008 -- Former California State Senator and Los Angeles City Councilman Nate Holden is holding a news conference, speaking out against American auto manufacturers and in support of mass-production of the electric car. The Honorable Nate Holden believes that the taxpayers should not bailout the auto manufacturers without The Big Three agreeing to mass-produce the electric car as an incentive.

Nate Holden states the following points:

* In 1990, the State of California enacted a zero-emissions mandate, forcing auto manufacturers who sold their cars in the State of California to require that at least 10% of the automobiles that are sold here have zero-emissions.

* In 2002 the Bush administration sided with the automakers to fight the zero-emissions mandate. The Bush administration, General Motors, other U.S. automakers and the oil companies committed sabotage against the American people and the environment. Because of the lawsuit, California will not make any strides in improving our air quality. To continue to build internal combustion engines will result in more photochemical smog and will cause more lung cancer and respiratory disease.

* At about that time, General Motors embarked on a program to deceive the public and the lawmakers. They introduced the EV1 as a revolutionary concept car. The EV1 had all the whistles and bells and if mass-produced, could have saved the automobile industry from its financial woes. At the beginning, General Motors and the other auto manufacturers never intended for the electric vehicle to be a successful program, specifically the EV1.

<>

Nate Holden served four terms on the Los Angeles City Council (1987 to 2003). He served as Chairman of the Air Quality and Waste Management Committee and eight years as the Chairman of the Transportation Committee. Holden served as Chairman of the Inter-Government Relations Committee and Vice-Chairman of the Public Safety Committee. Holden also served as a Vice-Chairman of the Rapid Transit District (RTD), a member of the LA County Transportation Committee (LACTC), and as a member of the LA Metropolitan Transit Authority (LAMTA).

Holden previously served four years as a California State Senator where he authored and co-authored more than 70 bills that became law. While in the Senate, he served as Vice-Chairman of the very important Public Utilities Transit and Energy Committee."

more

http://ev1.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. The problem with electric cars is the batteries are not yet in existance that are efficient.
That is why McCain offered people $100,000,000.00 to anyone who could come up with a better battery. I don't think we will see masses of electric cars built until we have the battery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Maybe that's part of the reason he lost
Electric cars are efficient and practical. I have one that uses 160-year-old technology and use it for 4/5 of my driving.

We won't see masses of electric cars built until we confront the effects of 150 years of petroleum-industry propaganda on the public consciousness.

http://www.aspire-ev.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good for you for going electric!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Was not the "zero-emissions mandate" also based on the hydrogen-fuel fantasy?
Whose backers bet that unproven fuel cell technology would convert hydrogen and oxygen into electrical energy?
Whose backers planned on using wind generation to create hydrogen through the very inefficient process of electrolysis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not specifically
It only required that 10 percent of new cars sold in the state by the six top carmakers be "nonpolluting" by 2003.

That would leave California with thousands of empty fueling stations, so Big Petro needed something else they could pump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
excess_3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Big Tax-xo didn't like electric cars because ...
electric cars don't pay gas tax.


.................................
and .... . then ...
. . .. . . a ...
miracle . .. occurs
................................


both the zero-emissions-mandate
and the electric cars
disappear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Implying that the oil companies promoted the hydrogen plan?
Is that what you are saying??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes
Oil companies are invested heavily in promoting a hydrogen infrastructure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. What is the deal with these assholes
its not enough for them to get filthy rich off our backs but they have to fuck with us while they do it. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Electric cars/batteries exist that allow a roundtrip commute, eg the Rav4 EV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC