Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Snubs Bush Plan For $10 Billion "Clean Tech" Fund - Administed By Coal-Lovin' World Bank

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:24 PM
Original message
Congress Snubs Bush Plan For $10 Billion "Clean Tech" Fund - Administed By Coal-Lovin' World Bank
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A planned $10 billion global fund for cleaner emissions technology backed by the Bush administration drew a skeptical bipartisan response from members of Congress and environmentalists on Thursday. David McCormick, the U.S. Treasury undersecretary for international affairs, explained the plan to a U.S. House of Representatives panel, noting the Bush administration has asked Congress to commit $2 billion to the fund over three years. The commitment for fiscal 2009 would be $400 million.

"What about the money?" asked U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, a Texas Republican and presidential candidate. "Has anybody considered how we're going to pay for this?" The fund would be administered by the World Bank, a fact that drew criticism from some lawmakers and other witnesses before a House panel on monetary policy, trade and technology.

"The World Bank has not compiled a record that most environmentalists approve of in its general operation," said Rep. Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. "It's like they do their environmental work one day a month and then they undo it. ... The World Bank should not be funding projects that would go counter to a concern for clean technology."

EDIT

Brent Blackwelder of the environmental group Friends of the Earth was dubious about the World Bank's commitment to clean energy technologies, noting the bank has recently made loans for coal plants that are only marginally less dirty than the dirtiest. "Having looked at and tried to convince the World Bank to shift the energy lending over 25 years into newer (energy) technologies that countries actually wanted, they have refused and continue to this day to fund very damaging projects," Blackwelder said.

EDIT

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/washington/politics-fund.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because we just haven't ruined the planet _enough_.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC