Having It All In America - Derrick Jackson Nails It Yet Again

[hatrack]

EDIT

"About 1,050 US soldiers are dead in Iraq. Up to 15,000 Iraqi civilians are dead. None of that has persuaded us Americans to put down the kaleidoscope and stop spinning in our own orbits. No amount of mass sacrifice abroad has resulted in mass sacrifice at home. No amount of failure in the original mission of finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq has made us question the fantasy of bullying the world. Our toys really are us. We're big, we're bad, and you Euro girlie-cars, we're cutting in.

It would be sad to conclude someday that our leaders sent our soldiers halfway around the world to die for our cars. In the absence of weapons of mass destruction and in the absence of Saddam Hussein being tied to Sept. 11, there is not much left to conclude. On its current website, the Economist Intelligence Unit says "the biggest potential prize" and an "ideal prospect" for international oil companies is Iraq, home to the world's second- or third-largest oil reserves. In 1993, the deaths of a mere 18 Army Rangers in resource-starved Somalia made us flee that country.

Today we accept 58 times more American fatalities to secure Iraq. We accept the death of human beings who just finished being boys and girls, yet we have not accepted the notion that to avoid losing more of them, the rest of us must grow up. In 1991, during the first Gulf War to defend Kuwait from Saddam, Americans were consuming 25.2 percent of the world's oil. Today the figure is 26.1 percent, according to statistics kept by British Petroleum.

A huge part of that consumption is our insistence on huge cars, symbolized by Hummers and Caddys. But almost everything about our lifestyles, from our obesity epidemic to our homes, reeks of not giving one whit about being only 4 percent of the planet's population yet creating a quarter of the greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming. Even though the size of the American family has shrunk over the last half-century, the size of the average American home has more than doubled, with a single home in the suburbs loaded with more technology than whole villages in the developing world. If any of this comes up during the debates, it will be a miracle. The last thing voters want to hear from a presidential candidate is that a more secure America means a less selfish America. You certainly will not hear that from President Bush, who says he can drill us into energy independence, even if that takes out a few snow geese and polar bears up in the Arctic. Nor will you probably hear much about sacrifice from his challenger, John Kerry. The Massachusetts senator has a voting record that earned him the endorsement of many environmental groups. But in the heat of pandering to voters, Kerry also said: "You want to drive a great big SUV? Terrific. That's America."

EDIT

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/debates/articles/2004/09/29/having_it_all_in_america/

[BeyondGeography]

1. Superb piece

The Pogo rule applies: We have met the enemy and, well, you know the rest...

[blindpig]

2. the ugly truth

we are a nation of swine. For every one of us that "thinks globally, acts locally" there's probably one who believes that if we must invade and slaughter to maintain our lifestyle then so be it. The rest quietly graze on the global commons, not thinking about much of anything that doesn't immediately affect them. Sad truth is, most people would just as soon be led, less thought and effort. That has been the genius of the fascist, and they have worked hammer and tong to reinforce this tendency. TV is their primary tool, not just the news but advertising and even the entertainment programming, all tend to promote conformity and consumption. It's why Kerry is the candidate, not Kucinich. Seems like a real wake up call is in order, I thought it happened on 09/11/01, but look how they twisted that. What's it gonna take?