Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Australian Energy Analysts Dismiss Carbon Burial As "Fantasy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 09:18 AM
Original message
Australian Energy Analysts Dismiss Carbon Burial As "Fantasy"
Edited on Wed Sep-29-04 09:18 AM by hatrack
CANBERRA, Sep 28 (IPS) - "A report by leading energy consultants has dismissed plans by the Australian government to promote the burying of greenhouse gases as the solution to climate change and has labelled the idea as an expensive and technologically uncertain strategy. ''Carbon capture and storage (CCS) power station technology systems are not yet operating on a commercial scale anywhere in the world,'' points out the report, written by a team headed by respected energy policy analyst Hugh Saddler.

The report 'Geosequestration: What is it and how much can it contribute to a sustainable energy policy for Australia?' was published by the Canberra-based think tank, the Australia Institute.

EDIT

While the Australian government's approach has the support of the coal industry and energy supply companies, Saddler argues that CCS will be much more expensive than new renewable power supply options such as gas fired power stations or wind power - or increasing the efficiency of energy use. ''All these technologies are far more mature than CCS; they are proven, already in widespread commercial use, but also, particularly in the case of wind, likely to fall considerably in cost over time as further experience with the technologies is gained,'' warn the report's authors.

EDIT

In mid-June, Howard launched the governments White Paper on energy strategy titled 'Securing Australia's Energy Future' which heavily promotes CCS. ''Why would we throw away this enormous natural advantage we have? So surely the smart commonsense thing to do in Australia's national interest is to try and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from the use of these fuels, and this is what the paper is designed to do,'' said Howard. While the government has been prepared to back the unproven technology of geosequestration, it refused to increase the five percent mandatory percentage of electricity power supply companies are required to buy from renewable energy suppliers, such as wind farms."

EDIT

http://www.ipsnews.net/africa/interna.asp?idnews=25631
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. The way to sequester carbon is to grow crops with no-till technology.
Using this technology along with other soil conservation techniques can increase the organic matter content of mineral soils in temperate regions from about 2% to 4 or 5% or even more. Do this on a wide enough scale and a lot of carbon will be stored in the soil. Extra bonus for the farmer is that the soil becomes more productive and less soil is lost to erosion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Better than crops is trees...................
trees will sequester carbon for many years. Crops will sequester it only for the time it takes to grow them and then the time it takes for eating/digestion of crops and decay of waste/byproducts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC