Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Study of Antarctic Ice Loss (not looking good)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:42 AM
Original message
New Study of Antarctic Ice Loss (not looking good)
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 09:44 AM by Viking12
From Greg Laden's blog:

The amount of ice lost to the sea from Antarctica has increased by 75 percent in the last 10 years. This is the result of an increase in glacial flow. It had previously been thought, and perhas was the case, that Greenland ice loss outpaced the Antarctica. This is no longer the case.

An article coming out in the next issue of Nature Geoscience, by Rignot et al ("Recent Antarctic ice mass loss from radar interferometry and regional climate modelling") is the most detailed study of this phenomenon to date.

There are two factors that affect the flow of ice into the sea at the edge of the southern continent. One is the amount of snow that falls across the continent, which might increase the total amount of water trapped in glacial ice, or might increase the speed of glacial movement towards the sea. The other is how rapidly the glaciers slide into the sea at the glaciers' "grounding sites,"

Global warming may have increased the amount of precipitation in Antarctica, which could increase the total volume of water trapped in this mass of ice. This would partially offset sea level rise caused by glacial melting in the Arctic and in mountain glaciers. However, warmer seas surrounding Antarctica and warmer air temperatures can cause the melting edge of the glaciers to mlt faster. When the grounding edge of the glaciers falls apart due to warm air or water, the mass of the glacier behind this leading edge moves more quickly to the sea.

http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/01/new_study_of_antarctic_ice_los.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Whoops! Can you say "Faster Than Expected"?
Good! I knew you could!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not going to say it. I'm just not. Holding my breath now...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I can!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'd love to see the center of power New York under water, I'm sorry don't mean to offend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. The letter itself can be found here
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 12:18 PM by OKIsItJustMe
http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/ngeo102.html

Letter abstract

Nature Geoscience
Published online: 13 January 2008 | doi:10.1038/ngeo102

Recent Antarctic ice mass loss from radar interferometry and regional climate modelling

Eric Rignot1,2,3, Jonathan L. Bamber4, Michiel R. van den Broeke5, Curt Davis6, Yonghong Li6, Willem Jan van de Berg5 & Erik van Meijgaard7

Large uncertainties remain in the current and future contribution to sea level rise from Antarctica. Climate warming may increase snowfall in the continent's interior1,2,3, but enhance glacier discharge at the coast where warmer air and ocean temperatures erode the buttressing ice shelves4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. Here, we use satellite interferometric synthetic-aperture radar observations from 1992 to 2006 covering 85% of Antarctica's coastline to estimate the total mass flux into the ocean. We compare the mass fluxes from large drainage basin units with interior snow accumulation calculated from a regional atmospheric climate model for 1980 to 2004. In East Antarctica, small glacier losses in Wilkes Land and glacier gains at the mouths of the Filchner and Ross ice shelves combine to a near-zero loss of 4±61 Gt yr-1. In West Antarctica, widespread losses along the Bellingshausen and Amundsen seas increased the ice sheet loss by 59% in 10 years to reach 132±60 Gt yr-1 in 2006. In the Peninsula, losses increased by 140% to reach 60±46 Gt yr-1 in 2006. Losses are concentrated along narrow channels occupied by outlet glaciers and are caused by ongoing and past glacier acceleration. Changes in glacier flow therefore have a significant, if not dominant impact on ice sheet mass balance.

  1. University of California Irvine, Earth System Science, Irvine, California 92697, USA
  2. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA
  3. Centro de Estudios Cientificos, Arturo Prat 514, Valdivia, Chile
  4. University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK
  5. Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research (IMAU), Utrecht University, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
  6. University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA
  7. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), 3732 GK De Bilt, The Netherlands
Correspondence to: Eric Rignot1,2,3 e-mail: erignot@uci.edu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC