Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Solar Powered Homes Sell Quickly Despite Market Crunch

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 01:45 PM
Original message
Solar Powered Homes Sell Quickly Despite Market Crunch
http://www.renewableaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=50474

Each of the 47 newly developed homes in Clarum Homes' new Hamilton Park community in Menlo Park, California is being sold with Sharp OnEnergy solar systems as standard features. The homes were put on the market this summer and 44 have already sold.

Coupled with other energy-saving features, the incorporation of solar arrays on the new Clarum residences will help homeowners reduce their utility bills significantly. Any excess electricity generated goes back into the utility grid — thereby spinning the meter backward, and accruing credit on the homeowner's utility bill.

"A solar electricity system adds tremendous value to the homes we build. By providing homeowners with attractive solar systems that generate electricity right on their rooftops and incorporating other energy efficiency features, we're enabling them to save 50 percent or more on their utility bills," said John Suppes, president of Clarum Homes and Byldan Corporation.

The Sharp systems feature all the necessary components for emissions- and maintenance-free operation, says the company, including a meter that allows homeowners to monitor system performance.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. If I were Emperor solar systems would be required in all new housing developments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think you need to be God to do that.

It would sure play hell with the Copernican model however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, because you can never have enough people who can't afford housing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. As opposed to not being able to afford to pay their heating/power bills? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sounds like 47 people can afford it.
An each one of them is reducing the loads on the rest of our systems. Don't like burning coal? Here's 47 homes that reduce the need to burn coal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Um, do you know what coal plants do?
Let me give you a hint. Coal plants don't have capacity utilization of their peak power of 25%.

In fact, the dangerous fossil fuel industry in California is dominated by dangerous natural gas. California gets its coal fired power from coal burned in other people's states.

We'll see if they continue in that direction when the gas is gone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
losthills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Are you taking the position....
that nuclear power lowers peoples' utility bills?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. As the technology matures and becomes more affordable
I'd like to see it become part of the building code. Along with tankless hot water heaters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
losthills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Tankless water heaters?
They're gas burners.

I think every home should be required to have a passive solar water heater-- as a bare minimum....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Of course. Excellent point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is hopeful indeed
and should be widely supported.

Thanks for posting.

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC