Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U. New South Wales Researchers Find Zero Birds In Northern Macquarie Marshes Wetland

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:05 PM
Original message
U. New South Wales Researchers Find Zero Birds In Northern Macquarie Marshes Wetland
An aerial survey by UNSW researchers reveals that waterbirds and water have vanished from the northern reaches of Macquarie Marshes wetland, north of Dubbo. "This year we didn't find a single bird in Marshes' northern region. It was heartbreaking," says UNSW river and waterbird expert Richard Kingsford.

The decline in water and bird life stem from the present drought and long-term effects of over-allocating water for irrigation. These are causing catastrophic changes on the rivers of the Murray-Darling Basin. It is the worst finding in the 25-year history of annual aerial waterbird surveys of eastern Australia done by UNSW scientists. The Macquarie Marches wetland is unique to Australia because of its large colonies of breeding ibis and egrets.

“In the 1980s we averaged 20,000 waterbirds from more than 20 species in the Marshes,” Professor Kingsford says. "In the 1990s that figure dropped to 5,000 birds from 13 species and since 2000 we have averaged around 600 birds from just nine species." Kingsford, who has just flown his 22nd year of the survey, believes the internationally-listed wetland is now collapsing. "This is one of Australia's most famous bird-breeding sites but we've had no bird sightings in the past seven years. Usually they breed every second year."

"The 2007 survey revealed that waterbirds and water were virtually absent from the Murray-Darling Basin and few wetlands held large numbers of waterbirds. Anyone who is privileged to see a lake with tens of thousands of waterbirds realises the significant toll that our overexploitation of rivers is causing," Kingsford says.

EDIT

http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news/20073110-16516.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Holy shit!
That's SHOCKING! :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What's really shocking
is just how many rivers no longer run to the sea, like the Colorado and the Rio Grande, to name a couple close to home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Rio Grande runs to the sea
I have been to its mouth. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Who you gonna believe, Wikipedia or your lyin' eyes
"In the summer of 2001 a 100m wide sandbar formed at the mouth of the river, marking the first time in recorded history that the Rio Grande failed to empty into the Gulf of Mexico. The sandbar was subsequently dredged, but it re-formed almost immediately. Spring rains the following year flushed the re-formed sandbar out to sea, but it returned in the summer of 2002. Since then the sandbar has remained and now forms a usable land bridge between the US and Mexico. Ecologists fear that unless rainfall returns to normal levels during the next few years and strict water conservation measures are adopted by communities along the river, the Rio Grande may soon become extinct..."

I've never seen it, so I can't really dispute first hand evidence. Google earth shows a bar across the mouth, but the area is laced with a complicated network of streams, ponds, marshes and lagoons, some of which seem to connect to the Gulf. It's hard to tell. There are probably seasonal variations. Whatever the case, it is still a river system in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Here:
http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF8&ll=25.944307,-97.162399&spn=0.069926,0.155525&t=k&z=13&om=1

Most rivers in California have sandbars across their mouths, so that seems normal to me. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC