Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maybe 30 Years Left For Glaciers Atop Mexico's Tallest Mountains - Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:27 PM
Original message
Maybe 30 Years Left For Glaciers Atop Mexico's Tallest Mountains - Reuters
MEXICO CITY - Glaciers that crown Mexico's tallest mountains and inspired Aztec legends of lost love and a snake god could disappear within a few decades, with scientists pointing to global warming as a cause of their demise. "We estimate the glaciers could last another 20 or 30 years," Hugo Delgado, a glaciologist at Mexico City's UNAM university, said this week.

Mexico's two remaining glacial fields hold some of the world's few tropical glaciers, which are also found in South America, Africa and Papua New Guinea but are melting fast as world temperatures rise. The rise in temperatures has accelerated in recent decades and most scientists believe the use of fossil fuels is to blame.

Glaciers are massive, slow-moving rivers of ice and in the tropics can only exist on the cold peaks of tall mountains. Most tropical glaciers, like those in Mexico, are much smaller than their cousins cloer to the poles. Scientists say glacial melt in the tropics could hit farmers and cities across Latin America by reducing water availability and hydropower generation.

On Iztaccihuatl, a dormant volcano and one of two white-capped peaks that can be seen from Mexico City, glaciers have shrunk about 70 percent since 1960, according to University of Zurich glaciologist Christian Huggel. "Iztaccihuatl's glaciers are doomed to death," said Huggel, who studies tropical glaciers around the world.

EDIT

http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/43599/story.htm

Unless, of course, things move "faster than expected".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nearly all the other consequences seem to be occurring
faster than expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. 20 to 30 years is too optimistic, IMHO. I'm betting 10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nah. 10 years would be faster than expected.
Oh wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC