Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists Take Public Aim At Bush Mercury Trading Scheme

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 05:17 PM
Original message
Scientists Take Public Aim At Bush Mercury Trading Scheme
WASHINGTON, DC, June 29, 2004 (ENS) - "The rationale used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the electric utility industry to justify unconstrained trading of mercury emissions from power plants is unsound and misinterprets current research, according to comments on the proposed mercury rule submitted to the agency by 30 mercury scientists.

Four of the scientists presented their message last week to EPA Assistant Administrator Jeffrey Holmstead - including the scientist who co-authored the research they say has been misinterpreted. The scientists urged the agency to reconsider the use of a trading scheme to reduce mercury emissions, citing limited knowledge about the risks posed by such a program and evidence that it would create mercury "hot spots."

"The bottom line is, given what we currently know about mercury, unconstrained trading of mercury emissions is likely to cause areas of high local deposition - which have been referred to as hotspots" said Dr. Charles Driscoll, professor of Environmental Systems Engineering at Syracuse University and Trustee of the Hubbard Brook Research Foundation.

The scientists say the current national monitoring network for airborne mercury in the United States is "insufficient to measure the full impact of the proposed new regulations. In particular, the network is not designed to detect environmental response to changes in mercury emissions or the emergence of hotspots that might accompany a pollution trading program," they wrote in comments to the agency."

EDIT

http://forests.org/articles/reader.asp?linkid=33133
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Killing us slowly, sick f**ks.
I'm a victim of severe mercury poisoning and they want to put more of it in our environment!!!

Thank you *!

Thanks for the info hatrack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC