Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russia leads race for North Pole oil - Observer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 02:40 AM
Original message
Russia leads race for North Pole oil - Observer
Source: The Observer

Russia leads race for North Pole oil

The Arctic's untapped resources include huge reserves
of fuel and minerals. Now Moscow has raised tensions
by dispatching an expedition to annex a vast expanse
of the ocean.

Jamie Doward, Robin McKie and Tom Parfitt
Sunday July 29, 2007
The Observer


In the darkest depths of the Arctic Ocean a new Cold War is
brewing. American and British nuclear submarines lurk in the
shadows, preparing for company.

'Why has Britain been sending submarines into Arctic waters?'
asked Rob Huebert, associate director of the Centre for
Military and Strategic Studies in Calgary. 'Because it wants
to retain its capability to deal with the Russian threat.'

Such talk is redolent of a Le Carré novel. But the battle
between the West and Russia over who owns the Arctic has
been building for years. Last week it entered a new phase
when Russia announced it was sending a miniature submarine,
equipped with a team of explorers, to claim a chunk of the
Arctic Ocean the size of Western Europe.

The stakes are high. The ocean is home to vast oil and
mineral reserves as well as massive shoals of fish and
strategically important shipping lanes. 'It could get very
ugly,' Huebert said. 'Nobody knows how much oil and gas is
down there. Shell, for example, is quite pessimistic, but
the likes of Exxon are quite gung-ho. I've seen some people
make the case that up to 18 per cent of the world's oil
reserves are there - that's getting into Saudi Arabia's
league.'

-snip-

Read more: http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,2137048,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Angry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. All this tells me is that we just have to get off of oil and coal.

The ability is here to get off of it in a timely fashion. Let Canada/Norway/Russia fight over harsh climates for oil rigs.

If we would just spend a fraction of our military budget on the development of new renewable energy sources, energy storage technologies, etc., we could fix so many problems. We could put people to work in research, development, manufacturing, distribution, installation, maintenance, etc.

The for profit system just doesn't lend itself to thinking ahead. Why spend on the future when people are paying top dollar now?

Ack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC