Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Banks Dis The Volcker Rule - Firedoglake offers report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:51 AM
Original message
Banks Dis The Volcker Rule - Firedoglake offers report
http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/10/17/occ-trying-to-protect-banks-on-volcker-rule/

From the article:
<snip>
The rule would limit most proprietary trading, where a bank places bets for itself rather than for clients, a major money maker for the industry. Wall Street has warned that the rule will eat into profits just as banks are trying to regain their footing.

The CFTC’s objection was over the lack of a cost-benefit analysis in the proposal, which could open it up to legal challenge. They also said they didn’t have the staff to even analyze the rule. And this is one of the regulators!

This is a classic divide-and-conquer strategy. What FDIC wants to do here is pretty solid. I have some concerns with the Volcker rule’s implementation, but if bank executives are on the hook for compliance, they would have a strong incentive not to fudge the law. The OCC did the regulatory equivalent of a kamikaze mission over this provision, saying that it would be a dealbreaker. The end result was that the rule was turned into a “question” in the initial draft. In other words, the public is invited to offer their input on that provision, and the final decision will be put off until later. This CEO compliance rule was relegated to a question, along with 400 other pieces of the draft. Another rule turned into a question would make banks turn over trading data to an independent entity to scan for compliance. OCC didn’t want that either, along with the Federal Reserve. I guess they prefer self-reporting.

If the end result is delay of implementation, that serves the ends of the finance lobby just fine. They can ride OCC to keep their proprietary trading going as long as possible, and to keep the noses of regulators out of their books. It’s not good news that the only member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors to vote against the draft resolution on the Volcker rule was Sarah Bloom Raskin, the consumer protection specialist.

Meanwhile, this is all a bounty for those trying to influence the rule. One high-powered law firm, Davis Polk, has an entire website devoted to the Volcker rule. It’s happy hunting season for the lobbyists.

####

SAeveral commentators posted how intersting that the Big Banks always have the same excuse - "Don't make us obey regulations right now, just as we get back on our footing."

And one poster said that the above statement needed to be corrected to reflect things as they are ""Don't make us obey regulations right now, just as we get back on our Looting."
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC