Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Heinberg: The End of Growth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:20 PM
Original message
Heinberg: The End of Growth
Here are some excepts from an excerpt of a provocative upcoming book by Richard Heinberg.

The End of Growth

The central assertion of this book is both simple and startling: Economic growth as we have known it is over and done with.

The economic crisis that began in 2007-2008 was both foreseeable and inevitable, and it marks a permanent, fundamental break from past decades—a period during which most economists adopted the unrealistic view that perpetual economic growth is necessary and also possible to achieve. There are now fundamental barriers to ongoing economic expansion, and the world is colliding with those barriers.

There are three primary factors that stand firmly in the way of further economic growth:
  • The depletion of important resources including fossil fuels and minerals;
  • The proliferation of environmental impacts arising from both the extraction and use of resources (including the burning of fossil fuels)—leading to snowballing costs from both these impacts themselves and from efforts to avert them and clean them up; and
  • Financial disruptions due to the inability of our existing monetary, banking, and investment systems to adjust to both resource scarcity and soaring environmental costs—and their inability (in the context of a shrinking economy) to service the enormous piles of government and private debt that have been generated over the past couple of decades.
We have become so accustomed to growth that it’s hard to remember that it is actually is a fairly recent phenomenon.

During the past few millennia, as empires rose and fell, local economies advanced and retreated—but world economic activity expanded only slowly, and with periodic reversals. However, with the fossil fuel revolution of the past two centuries, we have seen growth at a speed and scale unprecedented in all of human history. We harnessed the energies of coal, oil, and natural gas to build and operate cars, trucks, highways, airports, airplanes, and electric grids—all the essential features of modern industrial society. Through the one-time-only process of extracting and burning hundreds of millions of years’ worth of chemically stored sunlight, we built what appeared (for a brief, shining moment) to be a perpetual-growth machine. We learned to take what was in fact an extraordinary situation for granted. It became normal.

But as the era of cheap, abundant fossil fuels comes to an end, our assumptions about continued expansion are being be shaken to their core.

In effect, we have to create a desirable “new normal” that fits the constraints imposed by depleting natural resources. Maintaining the “old normal” is not an option; if we do not find new goals for ourselves and plan our transition from a growth-based economy to a healthy equilibrium economy, we will by default create a much less desirable “new normal” whose emergence we are already beginning to see in the forms of persistent high unemployment, a widening gap between rich and poor, and ever more frequent and worsening financial and environmental crises—all of which translate to profound distress for individuals, families, and communities.

There's a lot of substance in the original article. Much of it has been discussed here in drive-by fashion, but Heinberg puts some meat on the bones of our current situation.

I find little to quibble with. Heinberg's conclusion that we need to change our definitions of success, our goals and the places we look for happiness echo my own thoughts. When a course of action had reached a dead end, giving up on it and choosing a new one is the apogee of realism. Our civilization has reached such a dead end with regard to material growth. It's time to make some radical new choices.
Refresh | +9 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wondering why we get depressed lately...???
*LOL*
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have gone long times (as a young person) without a working car,
with no a/c. No TV (radio though). Lived weeks in farmhouses with no indoor plumbing. I always traveled then on trains and not airliners (prop or jet). Our elec was for lights and fridge mostly, washing machine once in awhile and was locally generated. We never had a clothes dryer. I suppose that isn't primitive enough however. I READ. I could be happy going back to mainly READING(and writing). Our town was not backwoods at all but one could walk to get anywhere in it. I bicycled most of my youth also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. When I read Kunstler's World Made By Hand that is what I was thinking.
I also lived in situations like you. Life was harder but it was also calmer. We also had time to do things we enjoyed - no one seems to have time for anything today.

I want to add his book to my library of futurist books. I have the hope that my children will someday read them and understand where we are headed and not be so upset about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. I used to feel this doom and gloom about peak oil until I realized we have the ability to use
Our primary source of energy...aka the sun.

Really it is the key to everything. I despair that Obama hasn't done what he needs to advance renewable energy sources. His lack of attention to this area will make things more difficult in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree with him if growth is measured through a 1950's lens, but
China and other countries are investing hundreds of billions of dollars by looking to the next century, building on the silicones and alternatives to the energy sources we have used in the past to foster growth.

There is no reason that we couldn't, or shouldn't do the very same thing, except that we are surrounded by a myopic business and political climate that refuses to look anywhere but in the rear-view mirror in pursuit of short-term profit.

We are going to have to change that if we have any hope of having a future, because they are not going to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I just finished reading "Your World Is About To Get A Whole Lot Smaller" by Jeff Rubin
Edited on Sun Nov-14-10 09:11 PM by applegrove
and he says the same thing. That when oil gets too high we are going to suffer from one recession after another. He blames oil prices in 2007, 2008 for causing the housing bubble to explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DoctorK Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. sigh
"He blames oil prices in 2007, 2008 for causing the housing bubble to explode."

If only people had taken the money from MEW and selling houses to just keep buying and selling houses the bubble could have gone on forever. They had to go and spend the money on other things they wanted and inflate prices there too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Oh I'll admit the a bubble isn't a good thing. Because they always pop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DoctorK Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. we ain't seen nothing yet
"Our civilization has reached such a dead end with regard to material growth."

The growth in understanding with respect to genetics is going to result in a level of production for future generations that is completely unimaginable to us now and our primitive methods.

The financial disruptions are due to our existing monetary/banking system constantly perverting and subverting the investment system from being aligned with resource scarcity and human demand.

Government control of money is the single greatest threat to the continued prosperity of mankind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC