Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IMF Head Says Crisis Set to Continue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 01:35 AM
Original message
IMF Head Says Crisis Set to Continue
Global economic crisis to continue: IMF chief
http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE58B0K620090912">Reuters


The global economic crisis will continue and countries must do more to adopt financial market regulations, International Monetary Fund Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn told a German magazine on Saturday.

Strauss-Kahn said he wanted to see more action from nations to curb bankers’ pay and tighten capital requirements in the banking sector.

“It is right to say that not enough has happened. I hope the Group of 20 meeting in Pittsburgh will bring new momentum,” he said. Leaders of the G20 meet later this month to try to agree on measures to help stop a repeat of the financial crisis.

Strauss-Kahn said the lesson of the financial crisis was that the market economy needed rules to function.

“Without new rules, there will be a return to the old behavior,” he said.

Governments needed to develop ‘exit strategies’ from the stimulus packages introduced to boost economies, said Strauss-Kahn, adding, however, that it was dangerous to think the crisis was already over.

“We need such “exit strategies.” We are working on them, but I would disagree with any …. demand to think about implementing them now,” he said.

Asked by the magazine how liquidity that had been pumped onto the markets would be withdrawn, Strauss-Kahn said a combination of higher interest rates and ending direct intervention of central banks would be needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. More accurate subject line: French Socialist IMF chief demands regulation to prevent another crisis
He is not saying that the crisis will continue, but that unless the G20 governments go back to old style financial regulation, we are setting ourselves up for another crisis.

Believe it or not, the Bretton Woods financial institutions (World Bank and IMF) are subject to political pressures and policy shifts. After the catastrophic tenure of Michel Camdessus in the 90s, and the devastating critique of the IMF by World Bank chief economist Joseph Stiglitz, policy at the IMF began shifting.

Strauss-Kahn is a technocrat from the French Socialist Party, and his appointment is an ideological reversal from the Camdessus era.

The IMF, like the World Bank, was originally a Keynesian, not Thatcherite institution. In fact, it was literally created by John Maynard Keynes himself at Bretton Woods.

Strauss-Kahn is demanding a return to the old system of international financial regulation to make sure the kind of crisis we are in never happens again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
westerebus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Banker's pay.
Why do we simplify the term "pay" when we refer to banker's or corporate CEO's or CFO's or C_O's pay?

How about executive officer's compensation? Let's include everything they get. Use of corporate jets, country club memberships, golden parachutes, free lunches, security details that include family members, charitable contributions made on their behalf, corporate retreats and vacations.

A bonus of $100 million in stock options is icing on the cake.

Bonus payments, even if the company is incapable of meeting it's financial obligations, are a part of their compensation. Not the whole.

If they can get someone to pay them a $100,000,000.00 in total compensation, then good for them.

How about we tax them on their total compensation? Say 50%.

If they can't live on $50,000,000.00 then what are they doing wrong? Living beyond their means? How is that possible?

Apologies are in order. The cost of buying the government wasn't considered. How stupid of me?

Sure, buying congressmen is expensive. Buying the White House was expensive too. But, these are tough times.

They will take less in the future. Offer them some of those CDO's to get them off your books. I'm sure they would jump at the chance.

May be some consulting work? A seat on the board? A job for their kids? A Cabinet position? Pocket change. Not even a line on the expense account.

How about free, as in you don't pay for it, health insurance? There's a tricky one. No fear there. The Congress is hard at work on that very subject.

Next thing they will want is "free speech" with corporate money. Well that will never happen.

The rich, they are just not like you and me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC