Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Biggest Refunds from Recent Tax Cuts to Go to Small Number of Taxpayers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 10:58 AM
Original message
Biggest Refunds from Recent Tax Cuts to Go to Small Number of Taxpayers
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/business/national/8028075.htm

This spring, the U.S. government will distribute $195 billion in tax refunds, a 23 percent increase over the $158 billion handed back last year, the Treasury Department said. Taxpayers will save, on average, $300.

But much of those savings will flow to a relatively narrow slice of the population: primarily married couples with children, investors, high-income households and small businesses. Many rank-and-file taxpayers, including most single people, will see slight savings this year.

"People expected a lot, lot more," said Joan Baron, manager of the H&R Block office on Leesville Road in Raleigh.

"A lot of conditions have to be met for a person to receive a larger refund. ... Not everyone will see relief."

The biggest breaks of the 2003 tax law, formally named the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act, benefited people who own stocks and mutual funds. The law cut the rate on long-term capital gains from 20 percent to 15 percent, and to 5 percent for people in the lowest tax brackets. The same 15 percent rate would apply to qualified dividends. Previously, dividends were taxed at ordinary income tax rates as high as 38.6 percent.

But most people will see none of this money.

More at link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skippysmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Got a whopping $100 back
And it will have to go to pay my rising property taxes.

Thanks George!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masshole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. we didn't get Bush's Tax advance
And We are glad we didn't. We have three qualifying chidren. instead of getting $1200.00 last August we claimed the full $3000 credit. That credit resulted in a $2600.00 diference in our refund. Instead of a $2700.00 refund we are getting $5300.00.

So in essence by NOT getting the advance, we increased our refund by $1400.00.

Our taxes are done by a CPA, btw.

Sweet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. No Kids, No Stocks, No Mortgage, Nothing Back Here!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. On the Dole
The whole concept of taxes and public responsibility has been hijacked by the Cons. People need to understand that taxes are the dues we pay for a civil society. The upper income groups receive greater benefits on balance from the state and local governments than the lower income classes. This is the basis of Progressive taxation. All things being equal, the rates of taxation should be as low as possible within the framework of completely funding the civil society. It is deficits that are the "burden", not taxes.

It is not some "socialistic" redistribution of wealth as the Cons trumpet. It is a pay for benefits program. The majority of benefits and income flow to the very rich. They utilize the Federal Infrastructure to create personal wealth. Taxes are not a burden, but rather a real "cost of doing business."

In essence, paying taxes is patriotism and love of country. It is responsibility. It is the Cons meme that you can't get something for nothing. Why do they then refuse to pay for the benefits they receive?

Corporations are now paying the lowest level of taxes as a percent of income since the Great Depression. Doesn't that make them "on the dole?"

Let's start using the terms Tax Responsibility, Tax Obligations, Tax Fairness, National Investment. These are more descriptive of what taxes actually are. Let's change the dialog, to change the concept.

O
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave sharman Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. tax refund
I got $386 back but bushy boy won't renew extended unemployment compensation so now I have nothing.What a relief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC