Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roubini: 6 Million US Job Losses in 2009

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 02:17 PM
Original message
Roubini: 6 Million US Job Losses in 2009
Jan. 27 (Bloomberg) -- Global stock market declines are increasingly correlated and emerging economies will follow developed nations into a “severe recession,” according to New York University Professor Nouriel Roubini.

Roubini said economic growth in China will slow to less than 5 percent and the U.S. will lose 6 million jobs. The American economy will expand 1 percent at most in 2010 as private spending falls and unemployment climbs to at least 9 percent, he added.

“There is nowhere to hide,” Roubini, an economics professor at NYU’s Stern School of Business who predicted the financial crisis, said from Zurich in an interview with Bloomberg Television. “We have for the first time in decades a global synchronized recession. Markets have become perfectly correlated and economies are also becoming perfectly correlated. This is not your kind of traditional minor recession.”

Roubini said the U.S. government should nationalize the biggest banks because losses will exceed assets, threatening to push them into bankruptcy. The banks could be privatized again in two or three years, Roubini said. The professor reiterated his prediction that U.S. financial losses will more than triple to $3.6 trillion and that global equities will fall 20 percent this year from current levels.

‘Zombie Banks’

“Nobody’s in favor of long-term ownership of the U.S. banking system by the government, but if you don’t do it this way, you end up like Japan where you kept alive for a decade zombie banks that were never restructured,” he said. “That’s going to be much worse. It’s better to clean it up, nationalize it and sell it to the private sector.”

Japanese policy makers hesitated in addressing a banking crisis in the 1990s and then struggled to revive growth and fight deflation in what is known as the “Lost Decade.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aryXdRCs.Tow&refer=home

video......

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/01/roubini-6-million-job-losses-in-2009/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think he's being optimistic
Shiny new strip malls near me are showing empty storefronts. Old strip malls are just empty. The retail sector is getting hammered, and that's the job pool of last resort, labor intensive businesses that employ one hell of a lot of people.

This is only January. By March, it's going to be grisly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panAmerican Donating Member (864 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. I believed Roubini even before he was popular.
This is why I think that the rush to use up the rest of the TARP money is ill-advised, and will only make things worse. This is something I simply cannot support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. You're right. The first half of the TARP has disappeared
somewhere in the ether. We can't keep throwing out money blindly without fueling inflation, and inflation is the cruelest tax on the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Off to the Greatest...
Until people start listening to the ones who got it right, we're just playing with a box of band-aids.

However, I feel that if the public has to nationalize the banks and bail them out, someone needs some jail time for saddling the public with bad debts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't get why the tax payer should pay for CEOs mistakes, make no profit, then give them back.
Huh? The tax payers (i.e. workers) pay for the banks, 'nationalize them' through a big capitalist bailout-palooza, allow the corporate to keep the profit, and then "re-privatize" them--which means what? Give them back to the banksters to run into the ground again?

If we nationalize our banks, maybe we should elect officials to run them and have the profits go into rebuilding infrastructure. I suppose that takes out the whole 'global' aspect. Perhaps working class people should elect their bank CEOs around the world. Really, what do these parasites really do for us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC