Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IRS (back taxes) cellphone rule called outmoded

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 07:29 AM
Original message
IRS (back taxes) cellphone rule called outmoded
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 07:32 AM by flashl
Employers must pay back taxes if workers fail to keep detailed usage logs. Some see a disconnect between law and life.

By Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
July 28, 2008

WASHINGTON -- Small, cheap cellphones have become ubiquitous in the workplace. But federal tax rules governing them date to the days of big handsets, big bills and big hair.

Major employers, including the University of California system, have been hit with bills for hundreds of thousands of dollars in back taxes for violating the anachronistic laws. If the rules aren't changed, many employers say they will stop handing out cellphones to their workers.

The problem stems from the tax code's inability to keep up with technological advances.

..

The law requires employees to keep detailed records of all calls made on their work-issue cellphones, indicating whether they were business or personal. If they don't, the phone and wireless service are deemed a perk that must be listed as taxable income to the employee.

Most employers were unaware of the rules until the last few years, when the IRS began cracking down and requiring additional taxes to cover the value of the cellphone service provided to employees.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. must enforce or our current stable of wh war criminals will abuse further
yes it is too bad it get others - but not everything works well when free to government employees - they cheat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. AFAIC, its not about enforcement. Its an indicator where the government is looking for 'fast' money.
Complaints have circulated for years about 'selective' enforcement. Here's an example:

Agents Say Fast Audits Hurt I.R.S

New York Times

Top officials at the Internal Revenue Service are pushing agents to prematurely close audits of big companies with agreements to have them pay only a fraction of the additional taxes that could be collected, according to dozens of I.R.S. employees who say that the policy is costing the government billions of dollars a year.

“It’s catch and release,” said Douglas R. Johnson, an I.R.S. auditor in Colorado for three decades who said he grew so frustrated at how large corporations were allowed to pay far less than what he thought they owed that he transferred to the agency’s small-business division.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth4Justice Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. My employer wont give me a free tracking device aka a "tether" ? Please say its true !
I never thought I would want to kiss an IRS agent.

Keep that law on the books !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC