Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tax The Rich

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
jpertello Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:46 PM
Original message
Tax The Rich
Reprinted from "Sharing The Pie" by Steve Brouwer via the website Third World Traveler:




"Can the people of the United States retake control, once again taxing the richest citizens at a progressive rate and creating a fair society for all? If we had a Congress and a president who were willing to promote the interests of the vast majority of Americans, we could recapture some of the accumulated wealth that has been transferred to the rich over the last two decades. A reallocation of our resources could serve working people in the following ways:
* by creating full employment, with a higher minimum wage and shorter workweek
* by supporting quality day care for all who need it
* by providing for federally funded health care that serves everyone
* by rebuilding the nation's schools, roads, bridges, sewers, and parks
* by offering free higher education and other training to all citizens
Measures such as this will certainly cost hundreds of billions of dollars. Where can we get this kind of money while keeping the budget deficit reasonably low? There are several places to start:
* We must reestablish upper-bracket federal income tax rates comparable to those imposed during the prosperous decades of the 1950s and 1960s. The current effective rate on the richest 1 percent, whose income is at least $900 billion per year, is about 25 percent. An effective tax rate of 50 percent on the very richest 1 percent of Americans would raise an extra $225 billion.
* Raise the effective tax rate on corporate profits to 50 percent, the approximate rate of the 1950s. Profits have risen dramatically, to over $600 billion per year, while taxes have remained at an effective rate of about 25 percent, so this increase would yield another $150 billion.
* Institute an annual wealth tax of 3 percent on the richest 1 percent of Americans; this will yield $250 billion per year.
* Cut defense spending on new weaponry by $100 billion to stay in line with the diminished military budgets of the rest of the world."

--more--

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Economics/TaxRich.html

link to the book:
http://www.amazon.com/Sharing-Pie-Citizens-Guide-Wealth/dp/0805052062/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213555423&sr=8-1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Add an estate tax. First million free 2 - 5 million 25% tax 6 - 10 million 50% tax 10- 15 million 75
over 15 million 99% tax.
What would that raise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SergeyDovlatov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Most likely nothing
Any confiscatory taxes will be avoided through various estate planning schemes.
Most likely effect being that there will be very little estates over 15,000,000 in private hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. When the IRS spends as much on investigating them as they do on investigating the working man
we will see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Numbers need tinkering with
With the rate of inflation and the rise in housing prices, it may not be that long before the average estate is, on paper, worth two million or more. Also, I think you'd need more categories which makes it more progressive and therefore, fairer. It's a useful idea to start with though.

Hell, based on an article I read last year (and this is from memory, so don't ask me to cite it), simply closing the loopholes in the tax code would net about $30 billion annually. I'd support throwing out the whole tax code and starting again to close the loopholes and make it possible for humans to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. One thing is for certain....tax cuts for the rich has been an enormous
failure and detriment to our economy. I think it is high time to tax the people sucking off the tax laws that have enabled them to astromonical wealth...only in America. And, I mean taxing the corporations too. Those that have chosen to go off shore should pay huge tariffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. You could accomplish this WAY easier
Eliminate the capital gains tax, and start treating capital gains as income. With one change to the tax code, you're done, and Warren Buffet won't pay less in tax (as a percentage of his income) than his secretary any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I agree.
And I don't buy this nonsense about "people will stop investing!" either. The investor class invested back when capital gains were 35% and higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob Dobbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Too simple to pass.
And makes way too much sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Aggravating, but quite true.
It drives me absolutely NUTS, but it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. right-wingers who are always talking about incentives - try making income from LABOR tax-exempt
tax income earned from all sources the same but take their assinine arguments about why capital gains need to be tax-free and apply them to LABOR income. put a cap on it (say $50,000) to prevent too much evasion through recategorization.


actually i think just treating everything the same along with the sort of exemptions and deductions already in place would be fine, i just want to see their heads explode when we use the exact opposite of their positions!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Blackeye101 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Flat Tax or Fair tax
Europe's gone too it,they seem to be always one step ahead of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What country in Europe has gone to a flat tax?
I've not heard of this, and some quick Googling doesn't show any real results, other than one link that sais that the Italian right-wing is pushing it.

A cite would help your case here.

Oh, and welcome to DU...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackeye101 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Here are six, and thanks for the welcome
The countries that have recently reintroduced flat taxes have done so largely in the hope of boosting economic growth. The Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have had flat taxes of 24%, 25% and 33% respectively with a tax exempt amount, since the mid-1990s. On 1 January 2001, a 13% flat tax on personal income took effect in Russia. Ukraine followed Russia with a 13% flat tax in 2003, which later increased to 15% in 2007. Slovakia introduced a 19% flat tax on most taxes (that is, on corporate and personal income, for VAT etc., almost without exceptions) in 2004; Romania introduced a 16% flat tax on personal income and corporate profit on January 1, 2005. Macedonia introduced a 12% flat tax on personal income and corporate profit on January 1, 2007 and promised to cut it to 10% in 2008.<35> Albania would be implementing 10% flat tax from 2008.

When it comes to taxes, I am open to looking at anything other than what we now have in place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. You're wrong
The six nations listed are, unsurprisingly, some of the poorest in Europe.

Enjoy the granite cookie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. 300% tax for war profiteering
Triple damages is an accepted legal remedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. I disagree with the proposals, especially with the wealth tax
We should have a fair progressive tax system, but punishing wealth shouldn't be the motive behind it.

This country has this whole tax debate backward. We should find out what all the social and government programs costs first, then find out the lowest tax rate to pay for them in a fair progressive manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC