Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Russert actually say,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:30 PM
Original message
Poll question: Did Russert actually say,
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 11:31 PM by caraher
<edit to reformat poll>
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's what I know
I'm interested in verifying or debunking this alleged statement. While the fact that he served his corporate masters ahead of the truth doesn't rest on this utterance, it seems "too damning to be true." If you know more about the circumstances and sources of this quote than what I sketch below I'd love to hear the details!

-----< from a post I made on another thread >---------------

The original source for the quote seems to be a piece written by David Podvin, http://makethemaccountable.com/podvin/media/020109_Russert.htm">"Chocolates and nylons, sir?". Others on DU in past threads have asked for a source and this is where they all lead. Podvin himself gives no indication of how he came to know Russert said this - was he present? Who was there who told Podvin about it?

Googling David Podvin yields, in addition to his own writing, accounts on a few right-wing sites of futile efforts to make contact with the man. I'll spare you the links to those sites, but the author of this this relatively fair-minded blog has an account of utter failure in his efforts to verify this quote.

The bottom line is that Podvin's "scoops" might be too good to be true. We should, as members of the reality-based community, be VERY cautious about repeating these quotes, as they seem to be utterly unverifiable. I used that quote earlier today in an email and I now think that was a big mistake!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did he say WHAT? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "Integrity is for paupers"
According to this: http://makethemaccountable.com/podvin/media/020109_Russert.htm

At least I think that's what the OP is referring to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. DOH! yes, "integrity is for paupers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC