Someone tell Randi .. 'should have refused illegal orders'...however

[patdem]

according to the military...there were NO ORDERS...just a 'lark by a couple of bad apples'...so the whole 'they should have refused to comply with illegal orders' is BOGUS..that caller was a reight winger who thinks the small guy should be prosecuted because they 'followed orders'...why did not Randi say..if they were 'illegal orders' who gave those orders??? I am on dail up and cannot be on line and call also....I went to the post on Randi Rhodes but it is not about current calls! I wish AAR would have e-mail questions! :grr: