Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP reporter can't spell "bear"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:05 PM
Original message
WP reporter can't spell "bear"
not to be too nitpicky, but all Dana Priest had to do was spell it the way the questioner did in their question.

http://discuss.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/zforum/05/nation_priest033105.htm

Boston, Mass.: Does the administration itself bear any responsibility for the failure of its intelligence agencies?

Dana Priest: The CIA and its director work for the president. The president is responsible for hiring and firing that person, for holding that person and his agency responsible, for making sure, ultimately, that the agencies are working properly, spending more effectively and serving him--and the American people--the way it is supposed to. Was Nixon responsible for the operations of Attorney General John Mitchell? Were Johnson and Kennedy responsible, in any way, for the excesses of J. Edgar Hoover? Does Johnson bare any responsibility for McNamara's Vietnam vision? What about Bush I? What's his responsibility over a CIA that missed the collapse of the Soviet Union? Should Clinton bare a burden for the intel world's failure to see the imminent threat from Osama bin Laden? Does Bush have responsibility for his advisors so misjudging "post-war" Iraq? You get my drift. It's your call and you bet historians will be writing about that subject for years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. WP Editor apparently can't spell bear either
Nitpicky? Maybe, but that's one of the things editors are supposed to be paid for.

I can't bare this any longer, but I don't want to say too much, for fear of bearing my soul (or is that sole?).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marew Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. That would be hysterical if it wasn't so pathetic.
Maybe it's all tied in to the repukes phony White House paid "reporter" who apparently like to 'bare' all in gay porn magazines!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. ahem
Should Clinton bare a burden for the intel world's failure to see the imminent threat from Osama bin Laden?

not the intel world's failure.. but the Bush administration failure.

Intel was all over it, they even produced a PDB titled "Bin Laden determined to strike inside the united states".. (but the pres was on vacation)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC